TY - GEN
T1 - Capacity of multi-channel wireless networks with random (c, f) assignment
AU - Bhandari, Vartika
AU - Vaidya, Nitin H.
PY - 2007
Y1 - 2007
N2 - With the availability of multiple unlicensed spectral bands, and potential cost-based limitations on the capabilities of individual nodes, it is increasingly relevant to study the performance of multi-channel wireless networks with channel switching constraints. To this effect, some constraint models have been recently proposed, and connectivity and capacity results have been formulated for networks of randomly deployed single-interface nodes subject to these constraints. One of these constraint models is termed random (c, f) assignment, wherein each node is pre-assigned a random subset of f channels out of c (each having bandwidth Wc), and may only switch on these. Previous results for this model established bounds on network capacity, and proved that when c=O(logn), the per-flow capacity is O(Wp rndnlogn) and (Wfcnlogn) (where p rnd = 1 - (1-fc)(1-fc-1)...(1-fc- f+1) 1--f2c). In this paper we present a lower bound construction that matches the previous upper bound. This establishes the capacity as (Wprndnlogn). The surprising implication of this result is that when f=(c), random (c, f) assignment yields capacity of the same order as attainable via unconstrained switching. The routing/scheduling procedure used by us to achieve capacity requires synchronized route-construction for all flows in the network, leading to the open question of whether it is possible to achieve capacity using asynchronous procedures.
AB - With the availability of multiple unlicensed spectral bands, and potential cost-based limitations on the capabilities of individual nodes, it is increasingly relevant to study the performance of multi-channel wireless networks with channel switching constraints. To this effect, some constraint models have been recently proposed, and connectivity and capacity results have been formulated for networks of randomly deployed single-interface nodes subject to these constraints. One of these constraint models is termed random (c, f) assignment, wherein each node is pre-assigned a random subset of f channels out of c (each having bandwidth Wc), and may only switch on these. Previous results for this model established bounds on network capacity, and proved that when c=O(logn), the per-flow capacity is O(Wp rndnlogn) and (Wfcnlogn) (where p rnd = 1 - (1-fc)(1-fc-1)...(1-fc- f+1) 1--f2c). In this paper we present a lower bound construction that matches the previous upper bound. This establishes the capacity as (Wprndnlogn). The surprising implication of this result is that when f=(c), random (c, f) assignment yields capacity of the same order as attainable via unconstrained switching. The routing/scheduling procedure used by us to achieve capacity requires synchronized route-construction for all flows in the network, leading to the open question of whether it is possible to achieve capacity using asynchronous procedures.
KW - Capacity
KW - Multiple channels
KW - Random (c, f) assignment
KW - Switching constraints
KW - Wireless Networks
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=37849033249&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=37849033249&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1145/1288107.1288139
DO - 10.1145/1288107.1288139
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:37849033249
SN - 9781595936844
T3 - Proceedings of the International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc)
SP - 229
EP - 238
BT - MobiHoc'07
T2 - MobiHoc'07: 8th ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing
Y2 - 9 September 2007 through 14 September 2007
ER -