Cancer Communication Outside of the Physician-Patient Relationship: The Experience of Communicating and Understanding the Meaning of Prognosis

Matthew Adamson, Crina Cotoc, Kelsey Choi, Stephen John Notaro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Research Question: How does the process of engagement and integration of sources of information outside patient–physician interaction affect how individuals with cancer interpret their treatment experience and prognosis? Background: Studies of patient–physician communication of prognosis in oncology highlight areas where misunderstanding occurs: understanding consequences of treatment, likelihood of treatment success, probability of cure, status/progression of illness, and prognosis. Theories proposing mechanisms that underlie this discrepancy cannot account for all instances of misunderstanding, including when complete and direct physician disclosure occurs. Prior research focused on patient–physician communication event(s) and immediate antecedents and consequences. However, less is known about what happens to information once it has been communicated and how a patient’s process to interpret the meaning of their experience affects their understanding of it. Our study explores this question by examining patient communication with sources of information other than treating physicians. Methodology: We conducted 10 semi-structured qualitative interviews with individuals diagnosed with 4 types of cancer at different stages. The interviews were analyzed using inductive qualitative analysis. Results: Participants in our sample consulted a variety of additional sources to give context and understanding to their communicated prognosis. These were important contributors to how they understood their prognosis and incorporated that understanding. They included family, friends/acquaintances, cancer survivors, support/survivor groups, secondary health-care staff, and relevant informational materials. Different motivations for seeking out these sources were also expressed. Participants expressed a link between their understanding of their prognosis and the variety of outside sources they enlisted for input and support.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)711-717
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine
Volume36
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2019

Fingerprint

Physician-Patient Relations
Communication
Neoplasms
Survivors
Interviews
Physicians
Secondary Care
Disclosure
Research
Motivation
Therapeutics
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • cancer
  • cancer care
  • doctor–patient relationship
  • health communication
  • information-seeking behavior
  • palliative care
  • prognosis
  • prognosis communication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Cancer Communication Outside of the Physician-Patient Relationship : The Experience of Communicating and Understanding the Meaning of Prognosis. / Adamson, Matthew; Cotoc, Crina; Choi, Kelsey; Notaro, Stephen John.

In: American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, Vol. 36, No. 8, 01.08.2019, p. 711-717.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d248bf61b0f44759ae965bc16172dc94,
title = "Cancer Communication Outside of the Physician-Patient Relationship: The Experience of Communicating and Understanding the Meaning of Prognosis",
abstract = "Research Question: How does the process of engagement and integration of sources of information outside patient–physician interaction affect how individuals with cancer interpret their treatment experience and prognosis? Background: Studies of patient–physician communication of prognosis in oncology highlight areas where misunderstanding occurs: understanding consequences of treatment, likelihood of treatment success, probability of cure, status/progression of illness, and prognosis. Theories proposing mechanisms that underlie this discrepancy cannot account for all instances of misunderstanding, including when complete and direct physician disclosure occurs. Prior research focused on patient–physician communication event(s) and immediate antecedents and consequences. However, less is known about what happens to information once it has been communicated and how a patient’s process to interpret the meaning of their experience affects their understanding of it. Our study explores this question by examining patient communication with sources of information other than treating physicians. Methodology: We conducted 10 semi-structured qualitative interviews with individuals diagnosed with 4 types of cancer at different stages. The interviews were analyzed using inductive qualitative analysis. Results: Participants in our sample consulted a variety of additional sources to give context and understanding to their communicated prognosis. These were important contributors to how they understood their prognosis and incorporated that understanding. They included family, friends/acquaintances, cancer survivors, support/survivor groups, secondary health-care staff, and relevant informational materials. Different motivations for seeking out these sources were also expressed. Participants expressed a link between their understanding of their prognosis and the variety of outside sources they enlisted for input and support.",
keywords = "cancer, cancer care, doctor–patient relationship, health communication, information-seeking behavior, palliative care, prognosis, prognosis communication",
author = "Matthew Adamson and Crina Cotoc and Kelsey Choi and Notaro, {Stephen John}",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1049909119832811",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "711--717",
journal = "American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine",
issn = "1049-9091",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cancer Communication Outside of the Physician-Patient Relationship

T2 - The Experience of Communicating and Understanding the Meaning of Prognosis

AU - Adamson, Matthew

AU - Cotoc, Crina

AU - Choi, Kelsey

AU - Notaro, Stephen John

PY - 2019/8/1

Y1 - 2019/8/1

N2 - Research Question: How does the process of engagement and integration of sources of information outside patient–physician interaction affect how individuals with cancer interpret their treatment experience and prognosis? Background: Studies of patient–physician communication of prognosis in oncology highlight areas where misunderstanding occurs: understanding consequences of treatment, likelihood of treatment success, probability of cure, status/progression of illness, and prognosis. Theories proposing mechanisms that underlie this discrepancy cannot account for all instances of misunderstanding, including when complete and direct physician disclosure occurs. Prior research focused on patient–physician communication event(s) and immediate antecedents and consequences. However, less is known about what happens to information once it has been communicated and how a patient’s process to interpret the meaning of their experience affects their understanding of it. Our study explores this question by examining patient communication with sources of information other than treating physicians. Methodology: We conducted 10 semi-structured qualitative interviews with individuals diagnosed with 4 types of cancer at different stages. The interviews were analyzed using inductive qualitative analysis. Results: Participants in our sample consulted a variety of additional sources to give context and understanding to their communicated prognosis. These were important contributors to how they understood their prognosis and incorporated that understanding. They included family, friends/acquaintances, cancer survivors, support/survivor groups, secondary health-care staff, and relevant informational materials. Different motivations for seeking out these sources were also expressed. Participants expressed a link between their understanding of their prognosis and the variety of outside sources they enlisted for input and support.

AB - Research Question: How does the process of engagement and integration of sources of information outside patient–physician interaction affect how individuals with cancer interpret their treatment experience and prognosis? Background: Studies of patient–physician communication of prognosis in oncology highlight areas where misunderstanding occurs: understanding consequences of treatment, likelihood of treatment success, probability of cure, status/progression of illness, and prognosis. Theories proposing mechanisms that underlie this discrepancy cannot account for all instances of misunderstanding, including when complete and direct physician disclosure occurs. Prior research focused on patient–physician communication event(s) and immediate antecedents and consequences. However, less is known about what happens to information once it has been communicated and how a patient’s process to interpret the meaning of their experience affects their understanding of it. Our study explores this question by examining patient communication with sources of information other than treating physicians. Methodology: We conducted 10 semi-structured qualitative interviews with individuals diagnosed with 4 types of cancer at different stages. The interviews were analyzed using inductive qualitative analysis. Results: Participants in our sample consulted a variety of additional sources to give context and understanding to their communicated prognosis. These were important contributors to how they understood their prognosis and incorporated that understanding. They included family, friends/acquaintances, cancer survivors, support/survivor groups, secondary health-care staff, and relevant informational materials. Different motivations for seeking out these sources were also expressed. Participants expressed a link between their understanding of their prognosis and the variety of outside sources they enlisted for input and support.

KW - cancer

KW - cancer care

KW - doctor–patient relationship

KW - health communication

KW - information-seeking behavior

KW - palliative care

KW - prognosis

KW - prognosis communication

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062456546&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062456546&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1049909119832811

DO - 10.1177/1049909119832811

M3 - Article

C2 - 30818959

AN - SCOPUS:85062456546

VL - 36

SP - 711

EP - 717

JO - American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine

JF - American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine

SN - 1049-9091

IS - 8

ER -