TY - JOUR
T1 - Can you picture it? Effects of positive and negative depictions of climate futures on climate action intentions
AU - Troy, Cassandra L.C.
AU - Norman, Megan
AU - Kim, Nahyun
AU - Skurka, Chris
AU - Myrick, Jessica Gall
N1 - This research was supported by the Science Communication Program within the Donald P. Bellisario College of Communications at Penn State.
PY - 2024/6
Y1 - 2024/6
N2 - Media messages about climate change are often negative, depicting dire future consequences if action is not taken. While the fear elicited by such messages may motivate audiences, there is growing evidence that hope is also an important driver of engagement in climate action. We conducted a pre-registered experiment with U.S. adults to examine how depictions of positive and negative climate futures (separately and in combination) impact climate action intentions through emotions, counterarguing, and ability to imagine a positive future. We also examined collective efficacy and government efficacy as moderators. Findings shed light on the under-researched impacts of positive climate messaging, revealing benefits as well as risks. Moreover, results highlight the potential for counterarguing to hinder desirable responses to climate futures messaging, offer insights into effects of messages featuring both positive and negative elements, and point to the importance of audiences’ pre-existing government and collective efficacy beliefs in the processing of climate messages.
AB - Media messages about climate change are often negative, depicting dire future consequences if action is not taken. While the fear elicited by such messages may motivate audiences, there is growing evidence that hope is also an important driver of engagement in climate action. We conducted a pre-registered experiment with U.S. adults to examine how depictions of positive and negative climate futures (separately and in combination) impact climate action intentions through emotions, counterarguing, and ability to imagine a positive future. We also examined collective efficacy and government efficacy as moderators. Findings shed light on the under-researched impacts of positive climate messaging, revealing benefits as well as risks. Moreover, results highlight the potential for counterarguing to hinder desirable responses to climate futures messaging, offer insights into effects of messages featuring both positive and negative elements, and point to the importance of audiences’ pre-existing government and collective efficacy beliefs in the processing of climate messages.
KW - Climate change
KW - Collective efficacy
KW - Counterarguing
KW - Environmental communication
KW - Fear
KW - Hope
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85193284578&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85193284578&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102312
DO - 10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102312
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85193284578
SN - 0272-4944
VL - 96
JO - Journal of Environmental Psychology
JF - Journal of Environmental Psychology
M1 - 102312
ER -