Can Peers Improve Agricultural Revenue?

Tisorn Songsermsawas, Kathy Baylis, Ashwini Chhatre, Hope Michelson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Crop revenues vary greatly among farmers and the source of that variation is not fully understood, even after controlling for factors including input use, technology adoption, and other agro-climatic factors. One hypothesis that may explain the variation in outcomes among farmers is differential access to information through peers. Using a household survey from India containing detailed information about personal relationships, we estimate peer effects on cash crop revenue using a novel spatial econometric technique to control for reflection. Our results show that 60% of farmers' revenue is explained by peers. Peer effects are particularly large in pesticide use and in the cultivation of a new crop. However, peer effects in input expenditures and land allocation cannot fully explain the variation in revenue, implying peers may also associate with management, negotiation, and marketing. We find that peer effects are significant among farmers' self-reported peers, especially among those peers who are farmers' main advisors for agricultural matters. Although caste-based networks (both within the same and in adjacent villages) are important, their effect is smaller than that of self-reported peer networks. We empirically rule out that our effects are driven by other factors such as geographically correlated unobservables, farmers following a lead farmer or economies of scale. Our findings speak to both the potential and the limitations of peers as sources of agricultural information, and highlight the need for future research about how to best integrate peers into agricultural extension.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)163-178
Number of pages16
JournalWorld Development
Volume83
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2016

Fingerprint

revenue
farmer
technology adoption
agricultural extension
crop
economy of scale
caste
household survey
econometrics
expenditure
effect
Revenue
Peers
marketing
village
Farmers
pesticide
expenditures
India
economy

Keywords

  • Crop revenue
  • India
  • Peer effects
  • Social networks
  • South Asia
  • Spatial econometrics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Development
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Can Peers Improve Agricultural Revenue? / Songsermsawas, Tisorn; Baylis, Kathy; Chhatre, Ashwini; Michelson, Hope.

In: World Development, Vol. 83, 01.07.2016, p. 163-178.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Songsermsawas, Tisorn ; Baylis, Kathy ; Chhatre, Ashwini ; Michelson, Hope. / Can Peers Improve Agricultural Revenue?. In: World Development. 2016 ; Vol. 83. pp. 163-178.
@article{f2d8875e316d449589b26ba3c1ee614a,
title = "Can Peers Improve Agricultural Revenue?",
abstract = "Crop revenues vary greatly among farmers and the source of that variation is not fully understood, even after controlling for factors including input use, technology adoption, and other agro-climatic factors. One hypothesis that may explain the variation in outcomes among farmers is differential access to information through peers. Using a household survey from India containing detailed information about personal relationships, we estimate peer effects on cash crop revenue using a novel spatial econometric technique to control for reflection. Our results show that 60{\%} of farmers' revenue is explained by peers. Peer effects are particularly large in pesticide use and in the cultivation of a new crop. However, peer effects in input expenditures and land allocation cannot fully explain the variation in revenue, implying peers may also associate with management, negotiation, and marketing. We find that peer effects are significant among farmers' self-reported peers, especially among those peers who are farmers' main advisors for agricultural matters. Although caste-based networks (both within the same and in adjacent villages) are important, their effect is smaller than that of self-reported peer networks. We empirically rule out that our effects are driven by other factors such as geographically correlated unobservables, farmers following a lead farmer or economies of scale. Our findings speak to both the potential and the limitations of peers as sources of agricultural information, and highlight the need for future research about how to best integrate peers into agricultural extension.",
keywords = "Crop revenue, India, Peer effects, Social networks, South Asia, Spatial econometrics",
author = "Tisorn Songsermsawas and Kathy Baylis and Ashwini Chhatre and Hope Michelson",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.01.023",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "83",
pages = "163--178",
journal = "World Development",
issn = "1873-5991",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can Peers Improve Agricultural Revenue?

AU - Songsermsawas, Tisorn

AU - Baylis, Kathy

AU - Chhatre, Ashwini

AU - Michelson, Hope

PY - 2016/7/1

Y1 - 2016/7/1

N2 - Crop revenues vary greatly among farmers and the source of that variation is not fully understood, even after controlling for factors including input use, technology adoption, and other agro-climatic factors. One hypothesis that may explain the variation in outcomes among farmers is differential access to information through peers. Using a household survey from India containing detailed information about personal relationships, we estimate peer effects on cash crop revenue using a novel spatial econometric technique to control for reflection. Our results show that 60% of farmers' revenue is explained by peers. Peer effects are particularly large in pesticide use and in the cultivation of a new crop. However, peer effects in input expenditures and land allocation cannot fully explain the variation in revenue, implying peers may also associate with management, negotiation, and marketing. We find that peer effects are significant among farmers' self-reported peers, especially among those peers who are farmers' main advisors for agricultural matters. Although caste-based networks (both within the same and in adjacent villages) are important, their effect is smaller than that of self-reported peer networks. We empirically rule out that our effects are driven by other factors such as geographically correlated unobservables, farmers following a lead farmer or economies of scale. Our findings speak to both the potential and the limitations of peers as sources of agricultural information, and highlight the need for future research about how to best integrate peers into agricultural extension.

AB - Crop revenues vary greatly among farmers and the source of that variation is not fully understood, even after controlling for factors including input use, technology adoption, and other agro-climatic factors. One hypothesis that may explain the variation in outcomes among farmers is differential access to information through peers. Using a household survey from India containing detailed information about personal relationships, we estimate peer effects on cash crop revenue using a novel spatial econometric technique to control for reflection. Our results show that 60% of farmers' revenue is explained by peers. Peer effects are particularly large in pesticide use and in the cultivation of a new crop. However, peer effects in input expenditures and land allocation cannot fully explain the variation in revenue, implying peers may also associate with management, negotiation, and marketing. We find that peer effects are significant among farmers' self-reported peers, especially among those peers who are farmers' main advisors for agricultural matters. Although caste-based networks (both within the same and in adjacent villages) are important, their effect is smaller than that of self-reported peer networks. We empirically rule out that our effects are driven by other factors such as geographically correlated unobservables, farmers following a lead farmer or economies of scale. Our findings speak to both the potential and the limitations of peers as sources of agricultural information, and highlight the need for future research about how to best integrate peers into agricultural extension.

KW - Crop revenue

KW - India

KW - Peer effects

KW - Social networks

KW - South Asia

KW - Spatial econometrics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962671156&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962671156&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.01.023

DO - 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.01.023

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84962671156

VL - 83

SP - 163

EP - 178

JO - World Development

JF - World Development

SN - 1873-5991

ER -