TY - JOUR
T1 - Bus stop spacing statistics
T2 - Theory and evidence
AU - Devunuri, Saipraneeth
AU - Lehe, Lewis J.
AU - Qiam, Shirin
AU - Pandey, Ayush
AU - Monzer, Dana
N1 - The authors would like to thank Rafael H. M. Pereira at the Institute of Applied Economic Research in Brasília, who gave advice throughout the project. The authors would also like to thank Jonathan Wade and the team from RTD Denver who provided us the passenger count data.
PY - 2024/1
Y1 - 2024/1
N2 - Discussions of bus stop consolidation sometimes refer to average stop spacings, but there are no reliable statistics about spacings, nor methodologies for calculating them. This paper aims to clarify discussions of bus stop spacings by introducing clear definitions, a methodology for creating statistics from General Transit Feed Specification (GTFS) files, and a python package, gtfs-segments, which splits bus networks into isolated ‘segments.’ With the package, we calculate national-level statistics from 539 US transit providers and 83 Canadian providers, as well as agency-level statistics for 30 providers in the US, 10 in Canada, and a sample of 38 providers from other countries. Our estimates of US and Canadian mean spacings are both around 350 m (slightly wider than five stops per mile). US spacings are wider than sometimes claimed but narrower than those in other countries. Finally, the paper gives examples of metrics created by combining GTFS with data from other sources and proposes research ideas and applications to transit planning involving fine-grained stop spacing data.
AB - Discussions of bus stop consolidation sometimes refer to average stop spacings, but there are no reliable statistics about spacings, nor methodologies for calculating them. This paper aims to clarify discussions of bus stop spacings by introducing clear definitions, a methodology for creating statistics from General Transit Feed Specification (GTFS) files, and a python package, gtfs-segments, which splits bus networks into isolated ‘segments.’ With the package, we calculate national-level statistics from 539 US transit providers and 83 Canadian providers, as well as agency-level statistics for 30 providers in the US, 10 in Canada, and a sample of 38 providers from other countries. Our estimates of US and Canadian mean spacings are both around 350 m (slightly wider than five stops per mile). US spacings are wider than sometimes claimed but narrower than those in other countries. Finally, the paper gives examples of metrics created by combining GTFS with data from other sources and proposes research ideas and applications to transit planning involving fine-grained stop spacing data.
KW - Bus stop
KW - GTFS
KW - Public Transit
KW - Stop Spacings
KW - Transit Planning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85186992391&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85186992391&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpubtr.2024.100083
DO - 10.1016/j.jpubtr.2024.100083
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85186992391
SN - 1077-291X
VL - 26
JO - Journal of Public Transportation
JF - Journal of Public Transportation
M1 - 100083
ER -