Bridging versus bonding social capital and the management of common pool resources

Katherine R Baylis, Yazhen Gong, Shun Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Social capital facilitates community governance of common pool resources (CPRs), but not all social capital is alike. We argue that bonding social capital can improve CPRs management, while the effect of bridging social capital is mixed, depending on household poverty level and resource quality. We test these predictions using primary data from Yunnan Province in China on firewood collection on communal lands. We find that both bonding and bridging social capital decrease firewood extraction, but they erode each other's effect. Further, bridging social capital decreases firewood collection mainly for those near subsistence levels, or when forest quality is high.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)614-631
Number of pages18
JournalLand Economics
Volume94
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2018

Fingerprint

social capital
resource
subsistence
Common pool resources
Social capital
resource management
poverty
prediction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Bridging versus bonding social capital and the management of common pool resources. / Baylis, Katherine R; Gong, Yazhen; Wang, Shun.

In: Land Economics, Vol. 94, No. 4, 01.11.2018, p. 614-631.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{07a0af1c2d2c42ac898b717861f74520,
title = "Bridging versus bonding social capital and the management of common pool resources",
abstract = "Social capital facilitates community governance of common pool resources (CPRs), but not all social capital is alike. We argue that bonding social capital can improve CPRs management, while the effect of bridging social capital is mixed, depending on household poverty level and resource quality. We test these predictions using primary data from Yunnan Province in China on firewood collection on communal lands. We find that both bonding and bridging social capital decrease firewood extraction, but they erode each other's effect. Further, bridging social capital decreases firewood collection mainly for those near subsistence levels, or when forest quality is high.",
author = "Baylis, {Katherine R} and Yazhen Gong and Shun Wang",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3368/le.94.4.614",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "94",
pages = "614--631",
journal = "Land Economics",
issn = "0023-7639",
publisher = "University of Wisconsin Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bridging versus bonding social capital and the management of common pool resources

AU - Baylis, Katherine R

AU - Gong, Yazhen

AU - Wang, Shun

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - Social capital facilitates community governance of common pool resources (CPRs), but not all social capital is alike. We argue that bonding social capital can improve CPRs management, while the effect of bridging social capital is mixed, depending on household poverty level and resource quality. We test these predictions using primary data from Yunnan Province in China on firewood collection on communal lands. We find that both bonding and bridging social capital decrease firewood extraction, but they erode each other's effect. Further, bridging social capital decreases firewood collection mainly for those near subsistence levels, or when forest quality is high.

AB - Social capital facilitates community governance of common pool resources (CPRs), but not all social capital is alike. We argue that bonding social capital can improve CPRs management, while the effect of bridging social capital is mixed, depending on household poverty level and resource quality. We test these predictions using primary data from Yunnan Province in China on firewood collection on communal lands. We find that both bonding and bridging social capital decrease firewood extraction, but they erode each other's effect. Further, bridging social capital decreases firewood collection mainly for those near subsistence levels, or when forest quality is high.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054433191&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054433191&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3368/le.94.4.614

DO - 10.3368/le.94.4.614

M3 - Article

VL - 94

SP - 614

EP - 631

JO - Land Economics

JF - Land Economics

SN - 0023-7639

IS - 4

ER -