Abstract
In this paper, I discuss how I followed in the footsteps of Loïc Wacquant (2004) and took a closer and personal look at boxing as a leisure activity, from the point of view of those who participate in it, using embodied ethnography as the means of research. I was curious as to how and/or if leisure theory relates and applies to boxing, given the latter’s peculiar characteristics, which seem to equate it more with “work” than with “leisure.” I sought to answer a basic question, "Why do you box?" within these theoretical and methodological frameworks, and discovered that, while Robert Stebbins' casual/serious leisure dichotomy applied to boxing, the reality was far more complex than I had anticipated. The ethos of boxing did not fit neatly into any theoretical classifications, and the participant nature of the research allowed for a more nuanced analysis of boxing culture, with surprising results. Implications for leisure theory and directions for future research are discussed.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Article number | 6 |
Pages (from-to) | 1622-1636 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Qualitative Report |
Volume | 22 |
Issue number | 6 |
State | Published - Jun 16 2017 |
Keywords
- Behavior
- Boxing
- Casual Leisure
- Culture
- Embodied Ethnography
- Serious Leisure
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Psychology
- Cultural Studies
- Education