Born to run? Quantifying the balance of prior bias and new information in prey escape decisions

Nicholas M. Sutton, James Patrick O'Dwyer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Animal behaviors can often be challenging to model and predict, though optimality theory has improved our ability to do so. While many qualitative predictions of behavior exist, accurate quantitative models, tested by empirical data, are often lacking. This is likely due to variation in biases across individuals and variation in the way new information is gathered and used. We propose a modeling framework based on a novel interpretation of Bayes’s theorem to integrate optimization of energetic constraints with both prior biases and specific sources of new information gathered by individuals. We present methods for inferring distributions of prior biases within populations rather than assuming known priors, as is common in Bayesian approaches to modeling behavior, and for evaluating the goodness of fit of overall model descriptions. We apply this framework to predict optimal escape during predator-prey encounters, based on prior biases and variation in what information prey use. Using this approach, we collected and analyzed data characterizing white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) escape behavior in response to human approaches. We found that distance to predator alone was not sufficient to predict deer flight response and show that the inclusion of additional information is necessary. We also compared differences in the inferred distributions of prior biases across different populations and discuss the possible role of human activity in influencing these distributions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)321-331
Number of pages11
JournalAmerican Naturalist
Volume192
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2018

Fingerprint

deer
Odocoileus virginianus
predator
escape behavior
predators
modeling
human activity
energetics
animal behavior
physical activity
flight
decision
prediction
distribution
methodology
animal behaviour
method

Keywords

  • Animal behavior
  • Antipredator behavior
  • Decision-making
  • Modeling
  • Optimal escape theory
  • Predator-prey interactions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Born to run? Quantifying the balance of prior bias and new information in prey escape decisions. / Sutton, Nicholas M.; O'Dwyer, James Patrick.

In: American Naturalist, Vol. 192, No. 3, 01.09.2018, p. 321-331.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{12bd2a028f2f4b70aba984808df17cfa,
title = "Born to run? Quantifying the balance of prior bias and new information in prey escape decisions",
abstract = "Animal behaviors can often be challenging to model and predict, though optimality theory has improved our ability to do so. While many qualitative predictions of behavior exist, accurate quantitative models, tested by empirical data, are often lacking. This is likely due to variation in biases across individuals and variation in the way new information is gathered and used. We propose a modeling framework based on a novel interpretation of Bayes’s theorem to integrate optimization of energetic constraints with both prior biases and specific sources of new information gathered by individuals. We present methods for inferring distributions of prior biases within populations rather than assuming known priors, as is common in Bayesian approaches to modeling behavior, and for evaluating the goodness of fit of overall model descriptions. We apply this framework to predict optimal escape during predator-prey encounters, based on prior biases and variation in what information prey use. Using this approach, we collected and analyzed data characterizing white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) escape behavior in response to human approaches. We found that distance to predator alone was not sufficient to predict deer flight response and show that the inclusion of additional information is necessary. We also compared differences in the inferred distributions of prior biases across different populations and discuss the possible role of human activity in influencing these distributions.",
keywords = "Animal behavior, Antipredator behavior, Decision-making, Modeling, Optimal escape theory, Predator-prey interactions",
author = "Sutton, {Nicholas M.} and O'Dwyer, {James Patrick}",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1086/698692",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "192",
pages = "321--331",
journal = "American Naturalist",
issn = "0003-0147",
publisher = "University of Chicago",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Born to run? Quantifying the balance of prior bias and new information in prey escape decisions

AU - Sutton, Nicholas M.

AU - O'Dwyer, James Patrick

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - Animal behaviors can often be challenging to model and predict, though optimality theory has improved our ability to do so. While many qualitative predictions of behavior exist, accurate quantitative models, tested by empirical data, are often lacking. This is likely due to variation in biases across individuals and variation in the way new information is gathered and used. We propose a modeling framework based on a novel interpretation of Bayes’s theorem to integrate optimization of energetic constraints with both prior biases and specific sources of new information gathered by individuals. We present methods for inferring distributions of prior biases within populations rather than assuming known priors, as is common in Bayesian approaches to modeling behavior, and for evaluating the goodness of fit of overall model descriptions. We apply this framework to predict optimal escape during predator-prey encounters, based on prior biases and variation in what information prey use. Using this approach, we collected and analyzed data characterizing white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) escape behavior in response to human approaches. We found that distance to predator alone was not sufficient to predict deer flight response and show that the inclusion of additional information is necessary. We also compared differences in the inferred distributions of prior biases across different populations and discuss the possible role of human activity in influencing these distributions.

AB - Animal behaviors can often be challenging to model and predict, though optimality theory has improved our ability to do so. While many qualitative predictions of behavior exist, accurate quantitative models, tested by empirical data, are often lacking. This is likely due to variation in biases across individuals and variation in the way new information is gathered and used. We propose a modeling framework based on a novel interpretation of Bayes’s theorem to integrate optimization of energetic constraints with both prior biases and specific sources of new information gathered by individuals. We present methods for inferring distributions of prior biases within populations rather than assuming known priors, as is common in Bayesian approaches to modeling behavior, and for evaluating the goodness of fit of overall model descriptions. We apply this framework to predict optimal escape during predator-prey encounters, based on prior biases and variation in what information prey use. Using this approach, we collected and analyzed data characterizing white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) escape behavior in response to human approaches. We found that distance to predator alone was not sufficient to predict deer flight response and show that the inclusion of additional information is necessary. We also compared differences in the inferred distributions of prior biases across different populations and discuss the possible role of human activity in influencing these distributions.

KW - Animal behavior

KW - Antipredator behavior

KW - Decision-making

KW - Modeling

KW - Optimal escape theory

KW - Predator-prey interactions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049945403&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049945403&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/698692

DO - 10.1086/698692

M3 - Article

C2 - 30125227

AN - SCOPUS:85049945403

VL - 192

SP - 321

EP - 331

JO - American Naturalist

JF - American Naturalist

SN - 0003-0147

IS - 3

ER -