TY - JOUR
T1 - Blanding's turtle hatchling survival and movements following natural vs. Artificial incubation
AU - Kastle, Monika
AU - Kapfer, Joshua
AU - Kuhns, Andrew R.
AU - Graser, William
AU - Glowacki, Gary
AU - Ibach, Andrew
AU - Mitchem, Lisa
AU - Mozuch, Joseph
AU - Rudolph, Nicholas
AU - Rutzen, Karl
AU - King, Richard
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding and logistical support was provided by The Nature Conservancy, Lake County Forest Preserve District, Forest Preserve District of Kane County, Forest Preserve District of DuPage County, Northern Illinois University, University of Illinois Urbana Champaign, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, University of Wisconsin-Whitewater, P. and G. Shackelford, S. Foster, R. Hay and Turtles for Tomorrow, C. Vogel, the Shearer Family, Mr. and Mrs. Hodge, C. Sweeny, M. Watrous, R. Conway, B. Parker, E. Sweeney, and J. Van Altena. Work was carried out under permits from the Illinois Department of Natural Resources (05-11s, 07-04s, and 16-045), Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (SCPSRLN-19-26, 586, and 645), Illinois Nature Preserves Commission, and The Nature Conservancy. Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approval was provided by Northern Illinois University (LA16-0015), University of Illinois (06129), and University of Wisconsin-Whitewater (K145011020Q). We gratefully acknowledge field assistance provided by J. Atkinson, K. Cassel, D. Fritz, C. Golba, K. Hausmann, B. House, J. Lorenz, P. Pieper, K. Rebman, K. Schmidt, Z. Welch, and S. Wyrick and the comments of two anonymous reviewers.
Funding Information:
Acknowledgments.—Funding and logistical support was provided by The Nature Conservancy, Lake County Forest Preserve District, Forest Preserve District of Kane County, Forest Preserve District of DuPage County, Northern Illinois University, University of Illinois Urbana Champaign, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, University of Wisconsin–Whitewater, P. and G. Shack-elford, S. Foster, R. Hay and Turtles for Tomorrow, C. Vogel, the Shearer Family, Mr. and Mrs. Hodge, C. Sweeny, M. Watrous, R. Conway, B. Parker, E. Sweeney, and J. Van Altena. Work was carried out under permits from the Illinois Department of Natural Resources (05-11s, 07-04s, and 16-045), Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (SCPSRLN-19-26, 586, and 645), Illinois Nature Preserves Commission, and The Nature Conservancy. Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approval was provided by Northern Illinois University (LA16-0015), University of Illinois (06129), and University of Wisconsin–Whitewater (K145011020Q). We gratefully acknowledge field assistance provided by J. Atkinson, K. Cassel, D. Fritz, C.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2021 Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles
PY - 2021/6/1
Y1 - 2021/6/1
N2 - To provide estimates of Blanding's Turtle (Emydoidae blandingii) hatchling survival and to better understand the utility of alternative management tactics targeting this age class, we monitored survival and movements after natural (caged) and artificial incubation by using radio telemetry. We found that survival was similarly high (ca. 80% over 88 days) across treatments and study locations. Movement distances were similar among treatments but differed among study locations, perhaps because of differences in release site habitat variables. Our results suggest that nest cages and artificial incubation are equally effective methods for increasing survival to hatching. Extrapolating from the 88 days of our study, until resumption of activity following hibernation, we found survival estimates of 40%-78%, depending on the survival function used. When coupled with published rates of nest survival (6%-41%) and hatch success (47%-87%), anticipated age 0 survival, from egg deposition to emergence from hibernation, ranged from 1%-28%. Although our analysis fills a knowledge gap in Blanding's Turtle demography, further study is needed to improve the precision of survival estimates.
AB - To provide estimates of Blanding's Turtle (Emydoidae blandingii) hatchling survival and to better understand the utility of alternative management tactics targeting this age class, we monitored survival and movements after natural (caged) and artificial incubation by using radio telemetry. We found that survival was similarly high (ca. 80% over 88 days) across treatments and study locations. Movement distances were similar among treatments but differed among study locations, perhaps because of differences in release site habitat variables. Our results suggest that nest cages and artificial incubation are equally effective methods for increasing survival to hatching. Extrapolating from the 88 days of our study, until resumption of activity following hibernation, we found survival estimates of 40%-78%, depending on the survival function used. When coupled with published rates of nest survival (6%-41%) and hatch success (47%-87%), anticipated age 0 survival, from egg deposition to emergence from hibernation, ranged from 1%-28%. Although our analysis fills a knowledge gap in Blanding's Turtle demography, further study is needed to improve the precision of survival estimates.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85107992043&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85107992043&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1670/20-084
DO - 10.1670/20-084
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85107992043
SN - 0022-1511
VL - 55
SP - 167
EP - 173
JO - Journal of Herpetology
JF - Journal of Herpetology
IS - 2
ER -