TY - JOUR
T1 - Bird strikes at commercial airports explained by citizen science and weather radar data
AU - Nilsson, Cecilia
AU - La Sorte, Frank A.
AU - Dokter, Adriaan
AU - Horton, Kyle
AU - Van Doren, Benjamin M.
AU - Kolodzinski, Jeffrey J.
AU - Shamoun-Baranes, Judy
AU - Farnsworth, Andrew
N1 - The authors thank the staff at the Port Authority of NY & NJ for diligent reporting and allowing them access, Susan Elbin and Kaitlyn Parkins of New York City Audubon for fruitful discussions and Daniel Fink at the Cornell Lab of Ornithology for help with the eBird analysis. They acknowledge that support for this study comes from the Leon Levy Foundation, Edward W. Rose Postdoctoral Fellowship, NSF DBI‐1661329, IIS‐1633206 and ICER‐1927743, the European Union's Horizon 2020 Marie Skłodowska‐Curie grant agreement no 844360, 2017‐2018 Belmont Forum and BiodivERsA joint call for research proposals, under the BiodivScen ERA‐Net COFUND programme, and with the funding organizations Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF 31BD30_184120), Belgian Federal Science Policy Office (BelSPO BR/185/A1/GloBAM‐BE), Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO E10008), Academy of Finland (aka 326315) and National Science Foundation (NSF 1927743).
PY - 2021/10
Y1 - 2021/10
N2 - Aircraft collisions with birds span the entire history of human aviation, including fatal collisions during some of the first powered human flights. Much effort has been expended to reduce such collisions, but increased knowledge about bird movements and species occurrence could dramatically improve decision support and proactive measures to reduce them. Migratory movements of birds pose a unique, often overlooked, threat to aviation that is particularly difficult for individual airports to monitor and predict the occurrence of birds vary extensively in space and time at the local scales of airport responses. We use two publicly available datasets, radar data from the US NEXRAD network characterizing migration movements and eBird data collected by citizen scientists to map bird movements and species composition with low human effort expenditures but high temporal and spatial resolution relative to other large-scale bird survey methods. As a test case, we compare results from weather radar distributions and eBird species composition with detailed bird strike records from three major New York airports. We show that weather radar-based estimates of migration intensity can accurately predict the probability of bird strikes, with 80% of the variation in bird strikes across the year explained by the average amount of migratory movements captured on weather radar. We also show that eBird-based estimates of species occurrence can, using species’ body mass and flocking propensity, accurately predict when most damaging strikes occur. Synthesis and applications. By better understanding when and where different bird species occur, airports across the world can predict seasonal periods of collision risks with greater temporal and spatial resolution; such predictions include potential to predict when the most severe and damaging strikes may occur. Our results highlight the power of federating datasets with bird movement and distribution data for developing better and more taxonomically and ecologically tuned models of likelihood of strikes occurring and severity of strikes.
AB - Aircraft collisions with birds span the entire history of human aviation, including fatal collisions during some of the first powered human flights. Much effort has been expended to reduce such collisions, but increased knowledge about bird movements and species occurrence could dramatically improve decision support and proactive measures to reduce them. Migratory movements of birds pose a unique, often overlooked, threat to aviation that is particularly difficult for individual airports to monitor and predict the occurrence of birds vary extensively in space and time at the local scales of airport responses. We use two publicly available datasets, radar data from the US NEXRAD network characterizing migration movements and eBird data collected by citizen scientists to map bird movements and species composition with low human effort expenditures but high temporal and spatial resolution relative to other large-scale bird survey methods. As a test case, we compare results from weather radar distributions and eBird species composition with detailed bird strike records from three major New York airports. We show that weather radar-based estimates of migration intensity can accurately predict the probability of bird strikes, with 80% of the variation in bird strikes across the year explained by the average amount of migratory movements captured on weather radar. We also show that eBird-based estimates of species occurrence can, using species’ body mass and flocking propensity, accurately predict when most damaging strikes occur. Synthesis and applications. By better understanding when and where different bird species occur, airports across the world can predict seasonal periods of collision risks with greater temporal and spatial resolution; such predictions include potential to predict when the most severe and damaging strikes may occur. Our results highlight the power of federating datasets with bird movement and distribution data for developing better and more taxonomically and ecologically tuned models of likelihood of strikes occurring and severity of strikes.
KW - bird migration
KW - bird strikes
KW - citizen science
KW - eBird
KW - flight safety
KW - weather surveillance radar
KW - wildlife management
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85112736676
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85112736676#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1111/1365-2664.13971
DO - 10.1111/1365-2664.13971
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85112736676
SN - 0021-8901
VL - 58
SP - 2029
EP - 2039
JO - Journal of Applied Ecology
JF - Journal of Applied Ecology
IS - 10
ER -