TY - JOUR
T1 - Biomechanical influences on balance recovery by stepping
AU - Hsiao, Elizabeth T.
AU - Robinovitch, Stephen N.
N1 - This study was supported by grants from the Whitaker Foundation and the Academic Senate of the University of California, San Francisco. The authors are grateful to Qi Liu, Michel Kearns, and Vlad Frenk for their assistance in data collection and analysis.
PY - 1999/10
Y1 - 1999/10
N2 - Stepping represents a common means for balance recovery after a perturbation to upright posture. Yet little is known regarding the biomechanical factors which determine whether a step succeeds in preventing a fall. In the present study, we developed a simple pendulum-spring model of balance recovery by stepping, and used this to assess how step length and step contact time influence the effort (leg contact force) and feasibility of balance recovery by stepping. We then compared model predictions of step characteristics which minimize leg contact force to experimentally observed values over a range of perturbation strengths. At all perturbation levels, experimentally observed step execution times were higher than optimal, and step lengths were smaller than optimal. However, the predicted increase in leg contact force associated with these deviations was substantial only for large perturbations. Furthermore, increases in the strength of the perturbation caused subjects to take larger, quicker steps, which reduced their predicted leg contact force. We interpret these data to reflect young subjects' desire to minimize recovery effort, subject to neuromuscular constraints on step execution time and step length. Finally, our model predicts that successful balance recovery by stepping is governed by a coupling between step length, step execution time, and leg strength, so that the feasibility of balance recovery decreases unless declines in one capacity are offset by enhancements in the others. This suggests that one's risk for falls may be affected more by small but diffuse neuromuscular impairments than by larger impairment in a single motor capacity. Copyright (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd.
AB - Stepping represents a common means for balance recovery after a perturbation to upright posture. Yet little is known regarding the biomechanical factors which determine whether a step succeeds in preventing a fall. In the present study, we developed a simple pendulum-spring model of balance recovery by stepping, and used this to assess how step length and step contact time influence the effort (leg contact force) and feasibility of balance recovery by stepping. We then compared model predictions of step characteristics which minimize leg contact force to experimentally observed values over a range of perturbation strengths. At all perturbation levels, experimentally observed step execution times were higher than optimal, and step lengths were smaller than optimal. However, the predicted increase in leg contact force associated with these deviations was substantial only for large perturbations. Furthermore, increases in the strength of the perturbation caused subjects to take larger, quicker steps, which reduced their predicted leg contact force. We interpret these data to reflect young subjects' desire to minimize recovery effort, subject to neuromuscular constraints on step execution time and step length. Finally, our model predicts that successful balance recovery by stepping is governed by a coupling between step length, step execution time, and leg strength, so that the feasibility of balance recovery decreases unless declines in one capacity are offset by enhancements in the others. This suggests that one's risk for falls may be affected more by small but diffuse neuromuscular impairments than by larger impairment in a single motor capacity. Copyright (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd.
KW - Balance
KW - Biomechanics
KW - Mathematical model
KW - Posture
KW - Stepping
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0033213807
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0033213807#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1016/S0021-9290(99)00104-9
DO - 10.1016/S0021-9290(99)00104-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 10476848
AN - SCOPUS:0033213807
SN - 0021-9290
VL - 32
SP - 1099
EP - 1106
JO - Journal of Biomechanics
JF - Journal of Biomechanics
IS - 10
ER -