TY - JOUR
T1 - Biological computation
T2 - hearts and flytraps
AU - Kirkpatrick, Kay L.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was partially done on the territories of the Miami, Kickapoo, and Mascouten peoples. Many thanks to Pierre Albin, David Brewster, Adam Edwards, Shubhang Goswami, Evelyn Fox Keller, Brent Kirkpatrick, Gualtiero Piccinini, Patryk Szuta, and an anonymous reviewer for helpful comments and discussions. This work was partially supported by National Science Foundation CAREER award DMS-1254791.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/3
Y1 - 2022/3
N2 - The original computers were people using algorithms to get mathematical results such as rocket trajectories. After the invention of the digital computer, brains have been widely understood through analogies with computers and now artificial neural networks, which have strengths and drawbacks. We define and examine a new kind of computation better adapted to biological systems, called biological computation, a natural adaptation of mechanistic physical computation. Nervous systems are of course biological computers, and we focus on some edge cases of biological computing, hearts and flytraps. The heart has about the computing power of a slug, and much of its computing happens outside of its forty thousand neurons. The flytrap has about the computing power of a lobster ganglion. This account advances fundamental debates in neuroscience by illustrating ways that classical computability theory can miss complexities of biology. By this reframing of computation, we make way for resolving the disconnect between human and machine learning.
AB - The original computers were people using algorithms to get mathematical results such as rocket trajectories. After the invention of the digital computer, brains have been widely understood through analogies with computers and now artificial neural networks, which have strengths and drawbacks. We define and examine a new kind of computation better adapted to biological systems, called biological computation, a natural adaptation of mechanistic physical computation. Nervous systems are of course biological computers, and we focus on some edge cases of biological computing, hearts and flytraps. The heart has about the computing power of a slug, and much of its computing happens outside of its forty thousand neurons. The flytrap has about the computing power of a lobster ganglion. This account advances fundamental debates in neuroscience by illustrating ways that classical computability theory can miss complexities of biology. By this reframing of computation, we make way for resolving the disconnect between human and machine learning.
KW - Biological computation
KW - Biological information processing
KW - Computation
KW - Computational theory of mind
KW - Neural computation
KW - Neurocardiology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85123851771&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85123851771&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10867-021-09590-9
DO - 10.1007/s10867-021-09590-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 35089468
AN - SCOPUS:85123851771
SN - 0092-0606
VL - 48
SP - 55
EP - 78
JO - Journal of Biological Physics
JF - Journal of Biological Physics
IS - 1
ER -