Biodiversity conservation in local planning

James R. Miller, Martha Groom, George R. Hess, Toddi Steelman, David L. Stokes, Jan Thompson, Troy Bowman, Laura Fricke, Brandon King, Ryan Marquardt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Local land-use policy is increasingly being recognized as fundamental to biodiversity conservation in the United States. Many planners and conservation scientists have called for broader use of planning and regulatory tools to support the conservation of biodiversity at local scales. Yet little is known about the pervasiveness of these practices. We conducted an on-line survey of county, municipal, and tribal planning directors (n = 116) in 3 geographic regions of the United States: metropolitan Seattle, Washington; metropolitan Des Moines, Iowa; and the Research Triangle, North Carolina. Our objectives were to gauge the extent to which local planning departments address biodiversity conservation and to identify factors that facilitate or hinder conservation actions in local planning. We found that biodiversity conservation was seldom a major consideration in these departments. Staff time was mainly devoted to development mandates and little time was spent on biodiversity conservation. Regulations requiring conservation actions that might benefit biodiversity were uncommon, with the exception of rules governing water quality in all 3 regions and the protection of threatened and endangered species in the Seattle region. Planning tools that could enhance habitat conservation were used infrequently. Collaboration across jurisdictions was widespread, but rarely focused on conservation. Departments with a conservation specialist on staff tended to be associated with higher levels of conservation actions. Jurisdictions in the Seattle region also reported higher levels of conservation action, largely driven by state and federal mandates. Increased funding was most frequently cited as a factor that would facilitate greater consideration of biodiversity in local planning. There are numerous opportunities for conservation biologists to play a role in improving conservation planning at local scales.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)53-63
Number of pages11
JournalConservation Biology
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2009

Keywords

  • Conservation policy
  • Habitat conservation
  • Iowa
  • Land-use planning
  • Local conservation
  • North Carolina
  • Urbanization
  • Washington

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Biodiversity conservation in local planning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this