Beyond matchmaking: Considering aims for teacher data use

Margaret Evans, Priya LaLonde, Nora Gannon-Slater, Hope Crenshaw, Rebecca Teasdale, Jennifer Green, Thomas A Schwandt

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Teachers who practice data-driven decision-making (DDDM) often do so with different desired results. Teachers’ end goal or aim for DDDM promotes particular inquiries and decisions, while stifling other possibilities. This idea that teachers’ data use aims promote certain types of inquiries while stifling others is the theme of this chapter. This chapter presents an instrumental case study of elementary teachers’ data-driven decision-making. The authors position matchmaking and investigating as two distinct data use aims, which drove teachers toward different data-driven inquiries and decisions. Matchmaking is described as the practice of using student data to sort students into preexisting educational tracks. By contrast, investigating is described as teachers’ use of student data to reflect on their teaching practice, identify systemic barriers to student learning, and make informed decisions about curricula, their teaching strategies, and students’ learning environment. Multiple examples of matchmaking and investigating are offered in the chapter, and the authors close with an argument favoring investigating as a promising practice for DDDM.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationCases of Teachers' Data Use
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages112-127
Number of pages16
ISBN (Electronic)9781351676922
ISBN (Print)9781138056398
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

teacher
decision making
student
teaching strategy
teaching practice
learning environment
curriculum
learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Evans, M., LaLonde, P., Gannon-Slater, N., Crenshaw, H., Teasdale, R., Green, J., & Schwandt, T. A. (2018). Beyond matchmaking: Considering aims for teacher data use. In Cases of Teachers' Data Use (pp. 112-127). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165370

Beyond matchmaking : Considering aims for teacher data use. / Evans, Margaret; LaLonde, Priya; Gannon-Slater, Nora; Crenshaw, Hope; Teasdale, Rebecca; Green, Jennifer; Schwandt, Thomas A.

Cases of Teachers' Data Use. Taylor and Francis, 2018. p. 112-127.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Evans, M, LaLonde, P, Gannon-Slater, N, Crenshaw, H, Teasdale, R, Green, J & Schwandt, TA 2018, Beyond matchmaking: Considering aims for teacher data use. in Cases of Teachers' Data Use. Taylor and Francis, pp. 112-127. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165370
Evans M, LaLonde P, Gannon-Slater N, Crenshaw H, Teasdale R, Green J et al. Beyond matchmaking: Considering aims for teacher data use. In Cases of Teachers' Data Use. Taylor and Francis. 2018. p. 112-127 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165370
Evans, Margaret ; LaLonde, Priya ; Gannon-Slater, Nora ; Crenshaw, Hope ; Teasdale, Rebecca ; Green, Jennifer ; Schwandt, Thomas A. / Beyond matchmaking : Considering aims for teacher data use. Cases of Teachers' Data Use. Taylor and Francis, 2018. pp. 112-127
@inbook{8098518833314841bb0b2b7001da803f,
title = "Beyond matchmaking: Considering aims for teacher data use",
abstract = "Teachers who practice data-driven decision-making (DDDM) often do so with different desired results. Teachers’ end goal or aim for DDDM promotes particular inquiries and decisions, while stifling other possibilities. This idea that teachers’ data use aims promote certain types of inquiries while stifling others is the theme of this chapter. This chapter presents an instrumental case study of elementary teachers’ data-driven decision-making. The authors position matchmaking and investigating as two distinct data use aims, which drove teachers toward different data-driven inquiries and decisions. Matchmaking is described as the practice of using student data to sort students into preexisting educational tracks. By contrast, investigating is described as teachers’ use of student data to reflect on their teaching practice, identify systemic barriers to student learning, and make informed decisions about curricula, their teaching strategies, and students’ learning environment. Multiple examples of matchmaking and investigating are offered in the chapter, and the authors close with an argument favoring investigating as a promising practice for DDDM.",
author = "Margaret Evans and Priya LaLonde and Nora Gannon-Slater and Hope Crenshaw and Rebecca Teasdale and Jennifer Green and Schwandt, {Thomas A}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4324/9781315165370",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781138056398",
pages = "112--127",
booktitle = "Cases of Teachers' Data Use",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Beyond matchmaking

T2 - Considering aims for teacher data use

AU - Evans, Margaret

AU - LaLonde, Priya

AU - Gannon-Slater, Nora

AU - Crenshaw, Hope

AU - Teasdale, Rebecca

AU - Green, Jennifer

AU - Schwandt, Thomas A

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Teachers who practice data-driven decision-making (DDDM) often do so with different desired results. Teachers’ end goal or aim for DDDM promotes particular inquiries and decisions, while stifling other possibilities. This idea that teachers’ data use aims promote certain types of inquiries while stifling others is the theme of this chapter. This chapter presents an instrumental case study of elementary teachers’ data-driven decision-making. The authors position matchmaking and investigating as two distinct data use aims, which drove teachers toward different data-driven inquiries and decisions. Matchmaking is described as the practice of using student data to sort students into preexisting educational tracks. By contrast, investigating is described as teachers’ use of student data to reflect on their teaching practice, identify systemic barriers to student learning, and make informed decisions about curricula, their teaching strategies, and students’ learning environment. Multiple examples of matchmaking and investigating are offered in the chapter, and the authors close with an argument favoring investigating as a promising practice for DDDM.

AB - Teachers who practice data-driven decision-making (DDDM) often do so with different desired results. Teachers’ end goal or aim for DDDM promotes particular inquiries and decisions, while stifling other possibilities. This idea that teachers’ data use aims promote certain types of inquiries while stifling others is the theme of this chapter. This chapter presents an instrumental case study of elementary teachers’ data-driven decision-making. The authors position matchmaking and investigating as two distinct data use aims, which drove teachers toward different data-driven inquiries and decisions. Matchmaking is described as the practice of using student data to sort students into preexisting educational tracks. By contrast, investigating is described as teachers’ use of student data to reflect on their teaching practice, identify systemic barriers to student learning, and make informed decisions about curricula, their teaching strategies, and students’ learning environment. Multiple examples of matchmaking and investigating are offered in the chapter, and the authors close with an argument favoring investigating as a promising practice for DDDM.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048666706&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048666706&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4324/9781315165370

DO - 10.4324/9781315165370

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85048666706

SN - 9781138056398

SP - 112

EP - 127

BT - Cases of Teachers' Data Use

PB - Taylor and Francis

ER -