Beyond Additions and Exceptions: The Category of Transgender and New Pedagogical Approaches for Women's Studies

Toby Beauchamp, Benjamin D'Harlingue

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The article argues that while introductory women and gender studies courses typically take social construction theory as foundational, their textbooks, supplemental materials, and teaching strategies simultaneously rely on a definition of "woman" that assumes particular body parts. Such a linkage elides the existence and particularities of transgender and gender-nonconforming bodies and subjects on the one hand, yet posits them as exceptions on the other. This combination stabilizes the normativity of hegemonic sex and gender embodiments by naturalizing nontransgender bodies. Rather than simply arguing for greater inclusion of trans subjects under the sign of woman or man, the article suggests that careful attention to the positioning of transgender bodies necessitates a broad theoretical reframing of how women's studies textbooks and curriculum are designed, and how gendered bodies more broadly are taught and conceptualized.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)25-51
Number of pages27
JournalFeminist Formations
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2012

Fingerprint

women's studies
textbook
normativity
gender studies
gender
teaching strategy
social construction
inclusion
curriculum

Keywords

  • feminist pedagogy
  • gendered bodies
  • introduction to women's studies
  • social construction theory
  • transgender studies

Cite this

Beyond Additions and Exceptions : The Category of Transgender and New Pedagogical Approaches for Women's Studies. / Beauchamp, Toby; D'Harlingue, Benjamin.

In: Feminist Formations, Vol. 24, No. 2, 01.06.2012, p. 25-51.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6e26ee8fc3794674ac8e9ac898e49627,
title = "Beyond Additions and Exceptions: The Category of Transgender and New Pedagogical Approaches for Women's Studies",
abstract = "The article argues that while introductory women and gender studies courses typically take social construction theory as foundational, their textbooks, supplemental materials, and teaching strategies simultaneously rely on a definition of {"}woman{"} that assumes particular body parts. Such a linkage elides the existence and particularities of transgender and gender-nonconforming bodies and subjects on the one hand, yet posits them as exceptions on the other. This combination stabilizes the normativity of hegemonic sex and gender embodiments by naturalizing nontransgender bodies. Rather than simply arguing for greater inclusion of trans subjects under the sign of woman or man, the article suggests that careful attention to the positioning of transgender bodies necessitates a broad theoretical reframing of how women's studies textbooks and curriculum are designed, and how gendered bodies more broadly are taught and conceptualized.",
keywords = "feminist pedagogy, gendered bodies, introduction to women's studies, social construction theory, transgender studies",
author = "Toby Beauchamp and Benjamin D'Harlingue",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1353/ff.2012.0020",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "25--51",
journal = "Feminist Formations",
issn = "2151-7363",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond Additions and Exceptions

T2 - The Category of Transgender and New Pedagogical Approaches for Women's Studies

AU - Beauchamp, Toby

AU - D'Harlingue, Benjamin

PY - 2012/6/1

Y1 - 2012/6/1

N2 - The article argues that while introductory women and gender studies courses typically take social construction theory as foundational, their textbooks, supplemental materials, and teaching strategies simultaneously rely on a definition of "woman" that assumes particular body parts. Such a linkage elides the existence and particularities of transgender and gender-nonconforming bodies and subjects on the one hand, yet posits them as exceptions on the other. This combination stabilizes the normativity of hegemonic sex and gender embodiments by naturalizing nontransgender bodies. Rather than simply arguing for greater inclusion of trans subjects under the sign of woman or man, the article suggests that careful attention to the positioning of transgender bodies necessitates a broad theoretical reframing of how women's studies textbooks and curriculum are designed, and how gendered bodies more broadly are taught and conceptualized.

AB - The article argues that while introductory women and gender studies courses typically take social construction theory as foundational, their textbooks, supplemental materials, and teaching strategies simultaneously rely on a definition of "woman" that assumes particular body parts. Such a linkage elides the existence and particularities of transgender and gender-nonconforming bodies and subjects on the one hand, yet posits them as exceptions on the other. This combination stabilizes the normativity of hegemonic sex and gender embodiments by naturalizing nontransgender bodies. Rather than simply arguing for greater inclusion of trans subjects under the sign of woman or man, the article suggests that careful attention to the positioning of transgender bodies necessitates a broad theoretical reframing of how women's studies textbooks and curriculum are designed, and how gendered bodies more broadly are taught and conceptualized.

KW - feminist pedagogy

KW - gendered bodies

KW - introduction to women's studies

KW - social construction theory

KW - transgender studies

U2 - 10.1353/ff.2012.0020

DO - 10.1353/ff.2012.0020

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 25

EP - 51

JO - Feminist Formations

JF - Feminist Formations

SN - 2151-7363

IS - 2

ER -