TY - JOUR
T1 - Best Practices and Considerations for Conducting Research on Diet–Gut Microbiome Interactions and Their Impact on Health in Adult Populations
T2 - An Umbrella Review
AU - Diacova, Tatiana
AU - Cifelli, Christopher J.
AU - Davis, Cindy D.
AU - Holscher, Hannah D.
AU - Kable, Mary E.
AU - Lampe, Johanna W.
AU - Latulippe, Marie E.
AU - Swanson, Kelly S.
AU - Karl, J. Philip
N1 - The group that conducted this work was organized by the Institute for the Advancement of Food and Nutrition Sciences (IAFNS). IAFNS is a nonprofit science organization that pools funding from industry and advances science through the in-kind and financial contributions from private and public sector members. Authors received no funding from IAFNS to conduct this work. Authors have no conflicts of interest related to this work to disclose. Cindy Davis is an Editorial Board Member for Advances in Nutrition and played no role in the journal's evaluation of the manuscript.
PY - 2025/5
Y1 - 2025/5
N2 - Diet modulates gut microbiome composition and function. However, determining causal links between diet–gut microbiome interactions and human health is complicated by inconsistencies in the evidence, arising partially from variability in research methods and reporting. Widespread adoption of standardized best practices would advance the field but require those practices to be identified, consolidated, and discussed. This umbrella review aimed to identify recommended best practices, define existing gaps, and collate considerations for conducting research on diet–gut microbiome interactions and their impact on human health outcomes. Reviews meeting inclusion criteria and published after 2013 were identified using a systematic search. Recommendations, considerations, and gaps relating to the best practices associated with study design, participant selection, dietary intervention/assessment, biological sample collection, and data analysis and reporting were extracted and consolidated. Eight narrative reviews were included. Several general points of agreement were identified, and a recurring theme was that best practices are dependent upon the research aims, outcomes, and feasibility. Multiple gaps were also identified. Some, such as suboptimal diet assessment methods and lack of validated dietary intake biomarkers, are particularly relevant to nutrition science. Others, including defining a “healthy” gut microbiome and the absence of standardized sample and data collection/analysis protocols, were relevant specifically to gut microbiome research. Gaps specific to diet–gut microbiome research include the underrepresentation of microbiome-modulating dietary components in food databases, lack of knowledge regarding interventions eliciting changes in the gut microbiome to confer health benefits, lack of in situ measurement methods, and the need to further develop and refine statistical approaches for integrating diet and gut microbiome data. Future research and cross-disciplinary exchange will address these gaps and evolve the best practices. In the interim, the best practices and considerations discussed herein, and the publications from which that information was extracted provide a roadmap for conducting diet–gut microbiome research. This trial was registered at PROSPERO as CRD42023437645.
AB - Diet modulates gut microbiome composition and function. However, determining causal links between diet–gut microbiome interactions and human health is complicated by inconsistencies in the evidence, arising partially from variability in research methods and reporting. Widespread adoption of standardized best practices would advance the field but require those practices to be identified, consolidated, and discussed. This umbrella review aimed to identify recommended best practices, define existing gaps, and collate considerations for conducting research on diet–gut microbiome interactions and their impact on human health outcomes. Reviews meeting inclusion criteria and published after 2013 were identified using a systematic search. Recommendations, considerations, and gaps relating to the best practices associated with study design, participant selection, dietary intervention/assessment, biological sample collection, and data analysis and reporting were extracted and consolidated. Eight narrative reviews were included. Several general points of agreement were identified, and a recurring theme was that best practices are dependent upon the research aims, outcomes, and feasibility. Multiple gaps were also identified. Some, such as suboptimal diet assessment methods and lack of validated dietary intake biomarkers, are particularly relevant to nutrition science. Others, including defining a “healthy” gut microbiome and the absence of standardized sample and data collection/analysis protocols, were relevant specifically to gut microbiome research. Gaps specific to diet–gut microbiome research include the underrepresentation of microbiome-modulating dietary components in food databases, lack of knowledge regarding interventions eliciting changes in the gut microbiome to confer health benefits, lack of in situ measurement methods, and the need to further develop and refine statistical approaches for integrating diet and gut microbiome data. Future research and cross-disciplinary exchange will address these gaps and evolve the best practices. In the interim, the best practices and considerations discussed herein, and the publications from which that information was extracted provide a roadmap for conducting diet–gut microbiome research. This trial was registered at PROSPERO as CRD42023437645.
KW - gut microbiota
KW - nutrition
KW - research methods
KW - study design
KW - systematic review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105003178344&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=105003178344&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.advnut.2025.100419
DO - 10.1016/j.advnut.2025.100419
M3 - Review article
C2 - 40180180
AN - SCOPUS:105003178344
SN - 2161-8313
VL - 16
JO - Advances in Nutrition
JF - Advances in Nutrition
IS - 5
M1 - 100419
ER -