Being Active and Impulsive

The Role of Goals for Action and Inaction in Self-Control

Justin Hepler, Dolores Albarracin, Kathleen C. McCulloch, Kenji Noguchi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Although self-control often requires behavioral inaction (i. e., not eating a piece of cake), the process of inhibiting impulsive behavior is commonly characterized as cognitively active (i. e., actively exerting self-control). Two experiments examined whether motivation for action or inaction facilitates self-control behavior in the presence of tempting stimuli. Experiment 1 used a delay discounting task to assess the ability to delay gratification with respect to money. Experiment 2 used a Go/No-Go task to assess the ability to inhibit a dominant but incorrect motor response to the words "condom" and "sex". The results demonstrate that goals for inaction promote self-control, whereas goals for action promote impulsive behavior. These findings are discussed in light of recent evidence suggesting that goals for action and inaction modulate physiological resources that promote behavioral execution.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)416-424
Number of pages9
JournalMotivation and Emotion
Volume36
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2012

Fingerprint

Aptitude
Impulsive Behavior
Condoms
Motivation
Eating
Self-Control
Delay Discounting

Keywords

  • Action
  • General goals
  • Inaction
  • Inhibition
  • Self-control

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Being Active and Impulsive : The Role of Goals for Action and Inaction in Self-Control. / Hepler, Justin; Albarracin, Dolores; McCulloch, Kathleen C.; Noguchi, Kenji.

In: Motivation and Emotion, Vol. 36, No. 4, 01.12.2012, p. 416-424.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hepler, Justin ; Albarracin, Dolores ; McCulloch, Kathleen C. ; Noguchi, Kenji. / Being Active and Impulsive : The Role of Goals for Action and Inaction in Self-Control. In: Motivation and Emotion. 2012 ; Vol. 36, No. 4. pp. 416-424.
@article{9cbdcf44e6b244f6b0e515d3cb42fd42,
title = "Being Active and Impulsive: The Role of Goals for Action and Inaction in Self-Control",
abstract = "Although self-control often requires behavioral inaction (i. e., not eating a piece of cake), the process of inhibiting impulsive behavior is commonly characterized as cognitively active (i. e., actively exerting self-control). Two experiments examined whether motivation for action or inaction facilitates self-control behavior in the presence of tempting stimuli. Experiment 1 used a delay discounting task to assess the ability to delay gratification with respect to money. Experiment 2 used a Go/No-Go task to assess the ability to inhibit a dominant but incorrect motor response to the words {"}condom{"} and {"}sex{"}. The results demonstrate that goals for inaction promote self-control, whereas goals for action promote impulsive behavior. These findings are discussed in light of recent evidence suggesting that goals for action and inaction modulate physiological resources that promote behavioral execution.",
keywords = "Action, General goals, Inaction, Inhibition, Self-control",
author = "Justin Hepler and Dolores Albarracin and McCulloch, {Kathleen C.} and Kenji Noguchi",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11031-011-9263-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "416--424",
journal = "Motivation and Emotion",
issn = "0146-7239",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Being Active and Impulsive

T2 - The Role of Goals for Action and Inaction in Self-Control

AU - Hepler, Justin

AU - Albarracin, Dolores

AU - McCulloch, Kathleen C.

AU - Noguchi, Kenji

PY - 2012/12/1

Y1 - 2012/12/1

N2 - Although self-control often requires behavioral inaction (i. e., not eating a piece of cake), the process of inhibiting impulsive behavior is commonly characterized as cognitively active (i. e., actively exerting self-control). Two experiments examined whether motivation for action or inaction facilitates self-control behavior in the presence of tempting stimuli. Experiment 1 used a delay discounting task to assess the ability to delay gratification with respect to money. Experiment 2 used a Go/No-Go task to assess the ability to inhibit a dominant but incorrect motor response to the words "condom" and "sex". The results demonstrate that goals for inaction promote self-control, whereas goals for action promote impulsive behavior. These findings are discussed in light of recent evidence suggesting that goals for action and inaction modulate physiological resources that promote behavioral execution.

AB - Although self-control often requires behavioral inaction (i. e., not eating a piece of cake), the process of inhibiting impulsive behavior is commonly characterized as cognitively active (i. e., actively exerting self-control). Two experiments examined whether motivation for action or inaction facilitates self-control behavior in the presence of tempting stimuli. Experiment 1 used a delay discounting task to assess the ability to delay gratification with respect to money. Experiment 2 used a Go/No-Go task to assess the ability to inhibit a dominant but incorrect motor response to the words "condom" and "sex". The results demonstrate that goals for inaction promote self-control, whereas goals for action promote impulsive behavior. These findings are discussed in light of recent evidence suggesting that goals for action and inaction modulate physiological resources that promote behavioral execution.

KW - Action

KW - General goals

KW - Inaction

KW - Inhibition

KW - Self-control

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84869081188&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84869081188&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11031-011-9263-4

DO - 10.1007/s11031-011-9263-4

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 416

EP - 424

JO - Motivation and Emotion

JF - Motivation and Emotion

SN - 0146-7239

IS - 4

ER -