TY - JOUR
T1 - Behavioral test methods workshop
AU - Slikker, William
AU - Acuff, Karen
AU - Boyes, William K.
AU - Chelonis, John
AU - Crofton, Kevin M.
AU - Dearlove, George E.
AU - Li, Abby
AU - Moser, Virginia C.
AU - Newland, Chris
AU - Rossi, John
AU - Schantz, Susan
AU - Sette, William
AU - Sheets, Larry
AU - Stanton, Mark
AU - Tyl, Shelley
AU - Sobotka, Thomas J.
N1 - Funding Information:
The views presented in this article do not necessarily reflect those of the US Food and Drug Administration. The development of this report was funded in part by the US Environmental Protection Agency. The report was reviewed by the National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory of the US EPA, and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents reflect the views of the Agency nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendations for use.
PY - 2005
Y1 - 2005
N2 - A one and a half day workshop on behavioral testing was conducted in order to discuss experimental procedures and practices that may help enhance the utility of behavioral data as a reliable index of neurotoxicity and in the safety evaluation of chemical substances. The workshop was open to participation by all sectors of the neuroscience community including academia, government, testing laboratories, and industry. The level of confidence with which changes in behavior can reliably signal adverse effects on the nervous system depends, in part, on the scientific quality of the data generated. With an emphasis on education and problem solving, the workshop focused on the practical aspects and scientific rationale underlying valid and high quality testing. In behavioral testing, there are numerous experimental factors that may impact on the quality of data. These include such elements as experimental design, selection of test methods, the care and precision in the conduct of behavioral testing, procedures to minimize bias and potential confounds, appropriateness of statistical analyses, and data interpretation. In plenary session investigators experienced in behavioral testing discussed the significance of these various experimental factors to data quality, outlined problematic issues, and presented a synopsis of approaches for addressing each of the factors as outlined in a draft of a primer developed by the Interagency Committee on Neurotoxicology (ICON). During the remainder of the workshop, open discussions in small breakout groups were used to address the problematic issues identified by the plenary speakers and explore alternative approaches for dealing with them. Finally, all workshop participants were reconvened in plenary session for summation of breakout group discussions and final recommendations. Information from the workshop was used to form the basis of this manuscript and will be used to help finalize a behavioral test methods primer being drafted by the ICON. The overall conclusions from the workshop were that consensus can be reached on the fundamentals of behavioral assessment, and that aspects of behavioral assessment including experimental design, test method selection, training, validation, control of confounds, data variability, data analysis, and data interpretation need to be carefully considered in the planning and conduct of behavioral safety assessments.
AB - A one and a half day workshop on behavioral testing was conducted in order to discuss experimental procedures and practices that may help enhance the utility of behavioral data as a reliable index of neurotoxicity and in the safety evaluation of chemical substances. The workshop was open to participation by all sectors of the neuroscience community including academia, government, testing laboratories, and industry. The level of confidence with which changes in behavior can reliably signal adverse effects on the nervous system depends, in part, on the scientific quality of the data generated. With an emphasis on education and problem solving, the workshop focused on the practical aspects and scientific rationale underlying valid and high quality testing. In behavioral testing, there are numerous experimental factors that may impact on the quality of data. These include such elements as experimental design, selection of test methods, the care and precision in the conduct of behavioral testing, procedures to minimize bias and potential confounds, appropriateness of statistical analyses, and data interpretation. In plenary session investigators experienced in behavioral testing discussed the significance of these various experimental factors to data quality, outlined problematic issues, and presented a synopsis of approaches for addressing each of the factors as outlined in a draft of a primer developed by the Interagency Committee on Neurotoxicology (ICON). During the remainder of the workshop, open discussions in small breakout groups were used to address the problematic issues identified by the plenary speakers and explore alternative approaches for dealing with them. Finally, all workshop participants were reconvened in plenary session for summation of breakout group discussions and final recommendations. Information from the workshop was used to form the basis of this manuscript and will be used to help finalize a behavioral test methods primer being drafted by the ICON. The overall conclusions from the workshop were that consensus can be reached on the fundamentals of behavioral assessment, and that aspects of behavioral assessment including experimental design, test method selection, training, validation, control of confounds, data variability, data analysis, and data interpretation need to be carefully considered in the planning and conduct of behavioral safety assessments.
KW - Behavior
KW - Control of confounds
KW - Data analysis
KW - Data interpretation and risk assessment
KW - Data variability
KW - Dose-response
KW - Experimental design
KW - Safety assessment
KW - Test method selection
KW - Training
KW - Validation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=20444417834&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=20444417834&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ntt.2005.02.003
DO - 10.1016/j.ntt.2005.02.003
M3 - Article
C2 - 15939202
AN - SCOPUS:20444417834
SN - 0892-0362
VL - 27
SP - 417
EP - 427
JO - Neurotoxicology and Teratology
JF - Neurotoxicology and Teratology
IS - 3
ER -