TY - JOUR
T1 - Bayesian reduced-order deep learning surrogate model for dynamic systems described by partial differential equations
AU - Wang, Yuanzhe
AU - Zong, Yifei
AU - McCreight, James L.
AU - Hughes, Joseph D.
AU - Tartakovsky, Alexandre M.
N1 - This material is based, in part, upon work supported by the U.S. Geological Survey, United States under Grant No. G22AP00361. Wang was partially supported by the U.S. Geological Survey, United States. Y. Zong was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Advanced Scientific Computing Research program. A.M. Tartakovsky was partially supported by the DOE project \u201CScience-Informed Machine Learning to Accelerate Real-time (SMART) Decisions in Subsurface Applications Phase 2 \u2013 Development and Field Validation,\u201D and the United States National Science Foundation. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory is operated by Battelle for the DOE under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the U.S. Geological Survey. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute their endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey.
This material is based, in part, upon work supported by the U.S. Geological Survey under Grant No. G22AP00361 . Wang was partially supported by the U.S. Geological Survey . Y. Zong was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Advanced Scientific Computing program . A.M. Tartakovsky was partially supported by the DOE project \u201CScience-Informed Machine Learning to Accelerate Real-time (SMART) Decisions in Subsurface Applications Phase 2 \u2013 Development and Field Validation\u201D, and the United States National Science Foundation . Pacific Northwest National Laboratory is operated by Battelle for the DOE under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830 .
PY - 2024/9/1
Y1 - 2024/9/1
N2 - We propose a reduced-order deep-learning surrogate model for dynamic systems described by time-dependent partial differential equations. This method employs space–time Karhunen–Loève expansions (KLEs) of the state variables and space-dependent KLEs of space-varying parameters to identify the reduced (latent) dimensions. Subsequently, a deep neural network (DNN) is used to map the parameter latent space to the state variable latent space. An approximate Bayesian method is developed for uncertainty quantification (UQ) in the proposed KL-DNN surrogate model. The KL-DNN method is tested for the linear advection–diffusion and nonlinear diffusion equations, and the Bayesian approach for UQ is compared with the deep ensembling (DE) approach, commonly used for quantifying uncertainty in DNN models. It was found that the approximate Bayesian method provides a more informative distribution of the PDE solutions in terms of the coverage of the reference PDE solutions (the percentage of nodes where the reference solution is within the confidence interval predicted by the UQ methods) and log predictive probability. The DE method is found to underestimate uncertainty and introduce bias. For the nonlinear diffusion equation, we compare the KL-DNN method with the Fourier Neural Operator (FNO) method and find that KL-DNN is 10% more accurate and needs less training time than the FNO method.
AB - We propose a reduced-order deep-learning surrogate model for dynamic systems described by time-dependent partial differential equations. This method employs space–time Karhunen–Loève expansions (KLEs) of the state variables and space-dependent KLEs of space-varying parameters to identify the reduced (latent) dimensions. Subsequently, a deep neural network (DNN) is used to map the parameter latent space to the state variable latent space. An approximate Bayesian method is developed for uncertainty quantification (UQ) in the proposed KL-DNN surrogate model. The KL-DNN method is tested for the linear advection–diffusion and nonlinear diffusion equations, and the Bayesian approach for UQ is compared with the deep ensembling (DE) approach, commonly used for quantifying uncertainty in DNN models. It was found that the approximate Bayesian method provides a more informative distribution of the PDE solutions in terms of the coverage of the reference PDE solutions (the percentage of nodes where the reference solution is within the confidence interval predicted by the UQ methods) and log predictive probability. The DE method is found to underestimate uncertainty and introduce bias. For the nonlinear diffusion equation, we compare the KL-DNN method with the Fourier Neural Operator (FNO) method and find that KL-DNN is 10% more accurate and needs less training time than the FNO method.
KW - Bayesian uncertainty quantification
KW - Dimensional reduction
KW - Machine learning
KW - Surrogate models
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85196140930&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85196140930&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cma.2024.117147
DO - 10.1016/j.cma.2024.117147
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85196140930
SN - 0045-7825
VL - 429
JO - Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
JF - Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
M1 - 117147
ER -