Bargaining When the Future of an Industry Is at Stake: Lessons from UAW-Ford Collective Bargaining Negotiations

Joel Cutcher-Gershenfeld

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The 2007 American automobile industry labor negotiations involved fundamental challenges for labor and management, including a historic shift of responsibility in the management of retiree health care, a need for new approaches to core employment security issues, identification of ways to create new unionized jobs in the industry, and a joint commitment to the competitive viability of U.S. operations. Less visible, but no less important in the United Auto Workers-Ford case, has been unprecedented levels of information sharing and unique innovations in the bargaining process designed to enable problem solving even when tough issues were on the table. More than 300 people were directly involved in the negotiations, serving at the main table and on twenty-four subcommittees. This case study covers the context for the negotiations, key events leading up to the bargaining, a unique process of "bargaining over how to bargain," the actual negotiation process, and the results achieved. Implications are generalizable to the broader concept of pattern bargaining and many other types of negotiations when transformation is on the table.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)115-145
Number of pages31
JournalNegotiation Journal
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2011

Keywords

  • Auto industry
  • Collective bargaining
  • Ford Motor Company
  • Interest-based bargaining
  • Labor
  • Management
  • Negotiations process
  • Pattern bargaining
  • Quality
  • Subcommittees
  • Transformation
  • United Auto Workers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Social Sciences
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bargaining When the Future of an Industry Is at Stake: Lessons from UAW-Ford Collective Bargaining Negotiations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this