Bank lines of credit as contingent liquidity: Covenant violations and their implications

Filippo Ippolito, Heitor Almeida, Ander Perez Orive, Viral Acharya

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We examine the relation between banks’ liquidity risk and their willingness to supply capital to borrowers under previously committed credit lines. We show that during the collapse of the asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP) market in the last quarter of 2007 and the first half of 2008, banks with higher exposure to ABCP conduits renegotiated significantly tougher conditions on the outstanding credit lines offered to borrowers in violation of a covenant. Specifically, we find that borrowers faced higher spreads over the prime rate and LIBOR as well as higher commitment fees on undrawn amounts. Our paper suggests that an increase in lender liquidity risk can bear financial implications for firms that use credit lines as an instrument of liquidity management.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Financial Intermediation
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Violations
Liquidity
Covenant
Credit
Assets
Liquidity risk
Willingness
Fees
Liquidity management

Keywords

  • Bank liquidity
  • Covenant violations
  • Lines of credit

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Bank lines of credit as contingent liquidity : Covenant violations and their implications. / Ippolito, Filippo; Almeida, Heitor; Orive, Ander Perez; Acharya, Viral.

In: Journal of Financial Intermediation, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7bdaf6820495497787ce7f3aa0aa8161,
title = "Bank lines of credit as contingent liquidity: Covenant violations and their implications",
abstract = "We examine the relation between banks’ liquidity risk and their willingness to supply capital to borrowers under previously committed credit lines. We show that during the collapse of the asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP) market in the last quarter of 2007 and the first half of 2008, banks with higher exposure to ABCP conduits renegotiated significantly tougher conditions on the outstanding credit lines offered to borrowers in violation of a covenant. Specifically, we find that borrowers faced higher spreads over the prime rate and LIBOR as well as higher commitment fees on undrawn amounts. Our paper suggests that an increase in lender liquidity risk can bear financial implications for firms that use credit lines as an instrument of liquidity management.",
keywords = "Bank liquidity, Covenant violations, Lines of credit",
author = "Filippo Ippolito and Heitor Almeida and Orive, {Ander Perez} and Viral Acharya",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jfi.2019.03.004",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Financial Intermediation",
issn = "1042-9573",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bank lines of credit as contingent liquidity

T2 - Covenant violations and their implications

AU - Ippolito, Filippo

AU - Almeida, Heitor

AU - Orive, Ander Perez

AU - Acharya, Viral

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - We examine the relation between banks’ liquidity risk and their willingness to supply capital to borrowers under previously committed credit lines. We show that during the collapse of the asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP) market in the last quarter of 2007 and the first half of 2008, banks with higher exposure to ABCP conduits renegotiated significantly tougher conditions on the outstanding credit lines offered to borrowers in violation of a covenant. Specifically, we find that borrowers faced higher spreads over the prime rate and LIBOR as well as higher commitment fees on undrawn amounts. Our paper suggests that an increase in lender liquidity risk can bear financial implications for firms that use credit lines as an instrument of liquidity management.

AB - We examine the relation between banks’ liquidity risk and their willingness to supply capital to borrowers under previously committed credit lines. We show that during the collapse of the asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP) market in the last quarter of 2007 and the first half of 2008, banks with higher exposure to ABCP conduits renegotiated significantly tougher conditions on the outstanding credit lines offered to borrowers in violation of a covenant. Specifically, we find that borrowers faced higher spreads over the prime rate and LIBOR as well as higher commitment fees on undrawn amounts. Our paper suggests that an increase in lender liquidity risk can bear financial implications for firms that use credit lines as an instrument of liquidity management.

KW - Bank liquidity

KW - Covenant violations

KW - Lines of credit

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064672413&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064672413&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jfi.2019.03.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jfi.2019.03.004

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85064672413

JO - Journal of Financial Intermediation

JF - Journal of Financial Intermediation

SN - 1042-9573

ER -