Avian diet and foraging ecology constrain foreign egg recognition and rejection

Alec B. Luro, Mark E. Hauber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Egg rejection is a common and effective defense against avian brood parasitism in which the host either marginalizes or removes the parasitic egg or deserts the parasitized clutch. The ability to recognize and reject a parasitic egg depends on bill morphology, sensory systems, and cognition, all of which are also shaped by other selective processes such as foraging. This begs the question whether specific phenotypes associated with different foraging strategies and diets may constrain or facilitate egg recognition and rejection. Here, we propose a novel hypothesis that host species phenotypes related to foraging ecology and diet may impose morphological and visual sensory constraints on the evolution of egg recognition and rejection. We conducted a comparative analysis of the adult diets and egg rejection rates of 165 current host and non-host species. We found that species have significantly higher egg rejection rates when they (1) consume an omnivorous or animal and fruit dominated diet rather than seeds and grains, (2) forage arboreally rather than aerially or on the ground, or (3) possess relatively larger body sizes. Although correlational in nature, as predicted, these results suggest phenotypes related to specific diets and foraging ecologies may differentially constrain or facilitate evolution of host egg rejection defenses against avian brood parasitism.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)24-31
Number of pages8
JournalAvian Biology Research
Volume13
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2020

Keywords

  • Egg rejection
  • foraging ecology
  • frugivory
  • granivory
  • host–parasite interactions
  • insectivory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Animal Science and Zoology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Avian diet and foraging ecology constrain foreign egg recognition and rejection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this