TY - JOUR
T1 - Automated Field of Interest Determination for Quantitative Ultrasound Analyses of Cervical Tissues
T2 - Toward Real-time Clinical Translation in Spontaneous Preterm Birth Risk Assessment
AU - Zuo, Jingyi
AU - Simpson, Douglas G.
AU - O'Brien, William D.
AU - McFarlin, Barbara L.
AU - Han, Aiguo
N1 - Research reported in this publication was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01HD089935. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Also, we thank the women who participated in the study and gratefully acknowledge Tara Peters, Barbara Meagher, Samantha Germino and Ewa Dymek-Kolanko for performing the ultrasound scans and drawing the fields of interest.
Research reported in this publication was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01HD089935 . The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Also, we thank the women who participated in the study, and gratefully acknowledge Tara Peters, Barbara Meagher, Samantha Germino, and Ewa Dymek-Kolanko for performing the ultrasound scans and drawing the fields of interest.
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - Objective: Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) analysis of the human cervix is valuable for predicting spontaneous preterm birth risk. However, this approach currently requires an offline processing step wherein a medically trained analyst manually draws a free-hand field of interest (Manual FOI) for QUS computation. This offline step hinders the clinical adoption of QUS. To address this challenge, we developed a method to determine automatically the cervical FOI (Auto FOI). This study's objective is to evaluate the agreement between QUS results obtained from the Auto and Manual FOIs and assess the feasibility of using the Auto FOI to replace the Manual FOI for cervical QUS computation. Methods: The auto FOI method was developed and evaluated using cervical ultrasound data from 527 pregnant women, using Manual FOIs as the reference. A deep learning model was developed using the cervical B-mode image as the input to determine automatically the FOI. Results: Quantitative comparison between the Auto and Manual FOIs yielded a high pixel accuracy of 97% and a Dice coefficient of 87%. Further, the Auto FOI yielded QUS biomarker values that were highly correlated with those obtained from the Manual FOIs. For example, the Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.87 between attenuation coefficient values obtained using Auto and Manual FOIs. Further, Bland–Altman analyses showed negligible bias between QUS biomarker values computed using the Auto and Manual FOIs. Conclusion: The results support the feasibility of using Auto FOIs to replace Manual FOIs in QUS computation, an important step toward the clinical adoption of QUS technology.
AB - Objective: Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) analysis of the human cervix is valuable for predicting spontaneous preterm birth risk. However, this approach currently requires an offline processing step wherein a medically trained analyst manually draws a free-hand field of interest (Manual FOI) for QUS computation. This offline step hinders the clinical adoption of QUS. To address this challenge, we developed a method to determine automatically the cervical FOI (Auto FOI). This study's objective is to evaluate the agreement between QUS results obtained from the Auto and Manual FOIs and assess the feasibility of using the Auto FOI to replace the Manual FOI for cervical QUS computation. Methods: The auto FOI method was developed and evaluated using cervical ultrasound data from 527 pregnant women, using Manual FOIs as the reference. A deep learning model was developed using the cervical B-mode image as the input to determine automatically the FOI. Results: Quantitative comparison between the Auto and Manual FOIs yielded a high pixel accuracy of 97% and a Dice coefficient of 87%. Further, the Auto FOI yielded QUS biomarker values that were highly correlated with those obtained from the Manual FOIs. For example, the Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.87 between attenuation coefficient values obtained using Auto and Manual FOIs. Further, Bland–Altman analyses showed negligible bias between QUS biomarker values computed using the Auto and Manual FOIs. Conclusion: The results support the feasibility of using Auto FOIs to replace Manual FOIs in QUS computation, an important step toward the clinical adoption of QUS technology.
KW - Deep learning
KW - Preterm birth
KW - Quantitative ultrasound
KW - Ultrasound imaging
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85203833017&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85203833017&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.08.011
DO - 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.08.011
M3 - Article
C2 - 39271408
AN - SCOPUS:85203833017
SN - 0301-5629
VL - 50
SP - 1861
EP - 1867
JO - Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
JF - Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
IS - 12
ER -