Audience Measurement and Media Fragmentation: Revisiting the Monopoly Question

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Many studies have examined contests between audience measurement systems in media markets. These suggest that the audience measurement industry is a natural monopoly. This study revisits the question with a novel approach by investigating a market at a time when two measurement services provided data. Executives were interviewed in the Indian television market on how they used information available from two competing ratings services. Although market participants recognized only one system (TAM, which provided weekly ratings) as the currency for trading advertising time, many used the second system (aMAP, an overnight ratings service) selectively for improving network performance. Therefore, fragmented markets can support multiple systems if they serve distinct institutional interests.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)203-219
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Media Economics
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2013
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Economics and Econometrics

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Audience Measurement and Media Fragmentation: Revisiting the Monopoly Question'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this