Attitudinal outcomes of boundary permeability: A comparison of Australian and Singaporean employees

Jennifer Loh, Simon Lloyd D. Restubog, Cindy Gallois

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the moderating role of culture in the relationship between boundary permeability and cooperation and work group identification. In addition, the levels of boundary permeability of Australians and Singaporeans are compared. Design/methodology/approach - Survey questionnaires were administered to 134 employees (87 Singaporeans and 47 Australians) working in multinational corporations in both Australia and Singapore. Hierarchical moderated regression was used to test whether culture moderated the relationship between boundary permeability and cooperation and workgroup identification. Findings - Results indicated that workplace boundary permeability was marginally and positively related to cooperation but not to workgroup identification. Further analysis revealed that culture moderated the relationships between workplace boundary permeability and cooperation and workgroup identification. Specifically, a stronger positive relationship was found between boundary permeability and these outcomes for Singaporeans as opposed to Australians. Research limitations/implications - Limitations include the relatively small sample size of both cultural groups; the behavioral measure used to assess cooperation; and the self-reported nature of the data. Practical implications - The findings of this study have important practical implications for managers working in multinational corporations who seek to promote cooperation and workgroup identification among culturally diverse employees. Originality/value - Guided by social identity and cross-cultural theories, this study highlights the role of culture in predicting the attitudinal consequences of boundary permeability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)118-134
Number of pages17
JournalCross Cultural Management
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

permeability
employee
multinational corporation
workplace
cultural theory
group work
Employees
Permeability
Singapore
manager
regression
questionnaire
methodology
Values

Keywords

  • Australia
  • Cross-cultural studies
  • Employee behaviour
  • Multinational companies
  • Singapore

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cultural Studies
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Attitudinal outcomes of boundary permeability : A comparison of Australian and Singaporean employees. / Loh, Jennifer; Restubog, Simon Lloyd D.; Gallois, Cindy.

In: Cross Cultural Management, Vol. 17, No. 2, 01.12.2010, p. 118-134.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f6e291afa3184218ae9503184fefc212,
title = "Attitudinal outcomes of boundary permeability: A comparison of Australian and Singaporean employees",
abstract = "Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the moderating role of culture in the relationship between boundary permeability and cooperation and work group identification. In addition, the levels of boundary permeability of Australians and Singaporeans are compared. Design/methodology/approach - Survey questionnaires were administered to 134 employees (87 Singaporeans and 47 Australians) working in multinational corporations in both Australia and Singapore. Hierarchical moderated regression was used to test whether culture moderated the relationship between boundary permeability and cooperation and workgroup identification. Findings - Results indicated that workplace boundary permeability was marginally and positively related to cooperation but not to workgroup identification. Further analysis revealed that culture moderated the relationships between workplace boundary permeability and cooperation and workgroup identification. Specifically, a stronger positive relationship was found between boundary permeability and these outcomes for Singaporeans as opposed to Australians. Research limitations/implications - Limitations include the relatively small sample size of both cultural groups; the behavioral measure used to assess cooperation; and the self-reported nature of the data. Practical implications - The findings of this study have important practical implications for managers working in multinational corporations who seek to promote cooperation and workgroup identification among culturally diverse employees. Originality/value - Guided by social identity and cross-cultural theories, this study highlights the role of culture in predicting the attitudinal consequences of boundary permeability.",
keywords = "Australia, Cross-cultural studies, Employee behaviour, Multinational companies, Singapore",
author = "Jennifer Loh and Restubog, {Simon Lloyd D.} and Cindy Gallois",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/13527601021038697",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "118--134",
journal = "Cross Cultural and Strategic Management",
issn = "2059-5794",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attitudinal outcomes of boundary permeability

T2 - A comparison of Australian and Singaporean employees

AU - Loh, Jennifer

AU - Restubog, Simon Lloyd D.

AU - Gallois, Cindy

PY - 2010/12/1

Y1 - 2010/12/1

N2 - Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the moderating role of culture in the relationship between boundary permeability and cooperation and work group identification. In addition, the levels of boundary permeability of Australians and Singaporeans are compared. Design/methodology/approach - Survey questionnaires were administered to 134 employees (87 Singaporeans and 47 Australians) working in multinational corporations in both Australia and Singapore. Hierarchical moderated regression was used to test whether culture moderated the relationship between boundary permeability and cooperation and workgroup identification. Findings - Results indicated that workplace boundary permeability was marginally and positively related to cooperation but not to workgroup identification. Further analysis revealed that culture moderated the relationships between workplace boundary permeability and cooperation and workgroup identification. Specifically, a stronger positive relationship was found between boundary permeability and these outcomes for Singaporeans as opposed to Australians. Research limitations/implications - Limitations include the relatively small sample size of both cultural groups; the behavioral measure used to assess cooperation; and the self-reported nature of the data. Practical implications - The findings of this study have important practical implications for managers working in multinational corporations who seek to promote cooperation and workgroup identification among culturally diverse employees. Originality/value - Guided by social identity and cross-cultural theories, this study highlights the role of culture in predicting the attitudinal consequences of boundary permeability.

AB - Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the moderating role of culture in the relationship between boundary permeability and cooperation and work group identification. In addition, the levels of boundary permeability of Australians and Singaporeans are compared. Design/methodology/approach - Survey questionnaires were administered to 134 employees (87 Singaporeans and 47 Australians) working in multinational corporations in both Australia and Singapore. Hierarchical moderated regression was used to test whether culture moderated the relationship between boundary permeability and cooperation and workgroup identification. Findings - Results indicated that workplace boundary permeability was marginally and positively related to cooperation but not to workgroup identification. Further analysis revealed that culture moderated the relationships between workplace boundary permeability and cooperation and workgroup identification. Specifically, a stronger positive relationship was found between boundary permeability and these outcomes for Singaporeans as opposed to Australians. Research limitations/implications - Limitations include the relatively small sample size of both cultural groups; the behavioral measure used to assess cooperation; and the self-reported nature of the data. Practical implications - The findings of this study have important practical implications for managers working in multinational corporations who seek to promote cooperation and workgroup identification among culturally diverse employees. Originality/value - Guided by social identity and cross-cultural theories, this study highlights the role of culture in predicting the attitudinal consequences of boundary permeability.

KW - Australia

KW - Cross-cultural studies

KW - Employee behaviour

KW - Multinational companies

KW - Singapore

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952048488&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952048488&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/13527601021038697

DO - 10.1108/13527601021038697

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79952048488

VL - 17

SP - 118

EP - 134

JO - Cross Cultural and Strategic Management

JF - Cross Cultural and Strategic Management

SN - 2059-5794

IS - 2

ER -