Attentional bias to negative emotion as a function of approach and withdrawal anger styles: An ERP investigation

Jennifer L. Stewart, Rebecca Levin Silton, Sarah M. Sass, Joscelyn E. Fisher, J. Christopher Edgar, Wendy Heller, Gregory A. Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Although models of emotion have focused on the relationship between anger and approach motivation associated with aggression, anger is also related to withdrawal motivation. Anger-out and anger-in styles are associated with psychopathology and may disrupt the control of attention within the context of negatively valenced information. The present study used event-related brain potentials (ERPs) to examine whether anger styles uniquely predict attentional bias to negative stimuli during an emotion-word Stroop task. High anger-out predicted larger N200, P300, and N400 to negative words, suggesting that aggressive individuals exert more effort to override attention to negative information. In contrast, high anger-in predicted smaller N400 amplitude to negative words, indicating that negative information may be readily available (primed) for anger suppressors, requiring fewer resources. Individuals with an anger-out style might benefit from being directed away from provocative stimuli that might otherwise consume their attention and foster overt aggression. Findings indicating that anger-out and anger-in were associated with divergent patterns of brain activity provide support for distinguishing approach- and withdrawal-related anger styles.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)9-18
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Psychophysiology
Volume76
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2010

Keywords

  • Anger
  • Cognitive resources
  • Emotion
  • Event-related potentials
  • Motivation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Neuroscience
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Physiology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Attentional bias to negative emotion as a function of approach and withdrawal anger styles: An ERP investigation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this