TY - JOUR
T1 - Attentional bias to negative emotion as a function of approach and withdrawal anger styles
T2 - An ERP investigation
AU - Stewart, Jennifer L.
AU - Silton, Rebecca Levin
AU - Sass, Sarah M.
AU - Fisher, Joscelyn E.
AU - Edgar, J. Christopher
AU - Heller, Wendy
AU - Miller, Gregory A.
PY - 2010/4
Y1 - 2010/4
N2 - Although models of emotion have focused on the relationship between anger and approach motivation associated with aggression, anger is also related to withdrawal motivation. Anger-out and anger-in styles are associated with psychopathology and may disrupt the control of attention within the context of negatively valenced information. The present study used event-related brain potentials (ERPs) to examine whether anger styles uniquely predict attentional bias to negative stimuli during an emotion-word Stroop task. High anger-out predicted larger N200, P300, and N400 to negative words, suggesting that aggressive individuals exert more effort to override attention to negative information. In contrast, high anger-in predicted smaller N400 amplitude to negative words, indicating that negative information may be readily available (primed) for anger suppressors, requiring fewer resources. Individuals with an anger-out style might benefit from being directed away from provocative stimuli that might otherwise consume their attention and foster overt aggression. Findings indicating that anger-out and anger-in were associated with divergent patterns of brain activity provide support for distinguishing approach- and withdrawal-related anger styles.
AB - Although models of emotion have focused on the relationship between anger and approach motivation associated with aggression, anger is also related to withdrawal motivation. Anger-out and anger-in styles are associated with psychopathology and may disrupt the control of attention within the context of negatively valenced information. The present study used event-related brain potentials (ERPs) to examine whether anger styles uniquely predict attentional bias to negative stimuli during an emotion-word Stroop task. High anger-out predicted larger N200, P300, and N400 to negative words, suggesting that aggressive individuals exert more effort to override attention to negative information. In contrast, high anger-in predicted smaller N400 amplitude to negative words, indicating that negative information may be readily available (primed) for anger suppressors, requiring fewer resources. Individuals with an anger-out style might benefit from being directed away from provocative stimuli that might otherwise consume their attention and foster overt aggression. Findings indicating that anger-out and anger-in were associated with divergent patterns of brain activity provide support for distinguishing approach- and withdrawal-related anger styles.
KW - Anger
KW - Cognitive resources
KW - Emotion
KW - Event-related potentials
KW - Motivation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953718398&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953718398&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.01.008
DO - 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.01.008
M3 - Article
C2 - 20109502
AN - SCOPUS:77953718398
SN - 0167-8760
VL - 76
SP - 9
EP - 18
JO - International Journal of Psychophysiology
JF - International Journal of Psychophysiology
IS - 1
ER -