At a loss for words: Dominating the conversation and the outcome in negotiation as a function of intricate arguments and communication media

Jeffrey Loewenstein, Michael W. Morris, Agnish Chakravarti, Leigh Thompson, Shirli Kopelman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Under what conditions do intricate pre-planned arguments enable negotiators to dominate the conversation and ultimately the outcome? We proposed the advantage occurs when the communication media involves the expectation of rapid turn-taking, because counterparts cannot generate rebuttals in time and end up making concessions. In an experiment with a negotiation task, sellers were provided with either intricate or simple arguments to support a competitive tactic and negotiated via either a quick-tempo (Instant Messaging) or slow-tempo (E-mail) medium. As predicted, intricate (versus simple) arguments enabled sellers to claim more value in the quick (Instant Messaging) but not the slow (E-mail) medium. Mediational analyses traced this effect through two process measures: the extent to which sellers enacted the competitive strategy (coded from transcripts), and the extent to which buyers consequently felt "at a loss" (measured by self-reports). We discuss the theoretical and practical consequences of these findings for negotiations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)28-38
Number of pages11
JournalOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Volume98
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2005
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Communication media
  • Dominance
  • Negotiation
  • Social interaction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'At a loss for words: Dominating the conversation and the outcome in negotiation as a function of intricate arguments and communication media'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this