Associations Between State Policies and Sexual Minority Mental Health Disparities

Nathan R. Todd, Daniel M. Nguyêñ, Allyson M. Blackburn, Raymond La

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Despite growing social acceptance, mental health disparities persist between sexual minorities—people who identify as lesbian, gay, or bisexual—and heterosexuals. A growing body of research demonstrates that the presence of structural stigma in one’s environment may contribute to such disparities. In this study, we examine state-level policy as one form of structural stigma that may help to explain these disparities. Specifically, we conducted a secondary data analysis of a large population-based survey (i.e., the Household Pulse Survey, N = 824,500, including all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia) to test whether state-level policies (i.e., religious exemption laws and nondiscrimination laws) were associated with anxiety and depression for sexual minorities and heterosexual adults. We found that both religious exemption laws and nondiscrimination laws were associated in expected directions with both anxiety and depression, though the effect was stronger for sexual minorities compared to heterosexuals. Moreover, these findings persisted after controlling for other individual- and state-level variables. Overall, this demonstrates the role of policy, as one form of structural stigma, in contributing to the mental health of sexual minorities. The limitations and directions for future research also are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)90-106
Number of pages17
JournalTranslational Issues in Psychological Science
Volume11
Issue number1
Early online dateNov 14 2024
DOIs
StateE-pub ahead of print - Nov 14 2024

Keywords

  • policy
  • sexual and gender minority mental health disparities
  • structural stigma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Psychology (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Associations Between State Policies and Sexual Minority Mental Health Disparities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this