Assessment validation in the context of high-stakes assessment

Katherine Ryan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Including the perspectives of stakeholder groups (e.g., teachers, parents) can improve the validity of high-stakes assessment interpretations and uses. How stakeholder groups view high-stakes assessments and their uses may differ significantly from state-level policy officials. The views of these stakeholders can contribute to identifying the strengths and weaknesses of the intended assessment interpretations and uses. This article proposes a process approach to validity that addresses assessment validation in the context of high-stakes assessment. The process approach includes a test evaluator or validator who considers the perspectives of five stakeholder groups at four different stages of assessment maturity in relationship to six aspects of construct validity. The tasks of the test evaluator and how stakeholders' views might be incorporated are illustrated at each stage of assessment maturity. How the test evaluator might make judgments about the merit of high-stakes assessment interpretations and uses is discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)7-15
Number of pages9
JournalEducational Measurement: Issues and Practice
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2002

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessment validation in the context of high-stakes assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this