Assessment of drainage nitrogen losses on a yield-scaled basis

Xu Zhao, Laura E. Christianson, Daren Harmel, Cameron M. Pittelkow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Subsurface nitrogen (N) losses represent a major environmental concern in agriculture, particularly from fields containing artificial drainage to prevent saturated soil conditions and increase crop production. To develop sustainable intensification strategies and achieve high yields with minimal environmental impacts, N losses are increasingly evaluated with respect to crop productivity on a “yield-scaled” basis, yet little information is available to address the current challenge of balancing crop yields and drainage N losses from intensive maize production systems in the U.S. Midwest by using this metric. In the present study, a meta-analysis was conducted using 31 studies with 381 observations from a publicly available nutrient loss drainage database (Measured Annual Nutrient loads from Agricultural Environments, MANAGE) to address this issue. Results showed that increasing N rates enhanced yields but had weak effects on area- and yield-scaled drainage N losses. In contrast, yield-scaled drainage N losses responded exponentially to N surplus (estimated as N application rate minus above-ground crop N uptake). Relative precipitation during the drainage monitoring period strongly influenced area- and yield-scaled drainage N losses. Maize-soybean rotations and silt loam soils had lower yield-scaled drainage N losses compared to continuous maize and clay loam soils, respectively, whereas tillage practices had little impact on yield-scaled drainage N losses. To meet the growing challenge of achieving high yields with minimal impacts on water quality, these results suggest that evaluating drainage N losses on a yield-scaled basis may complement the more conventional approach of evaluating N losses on an areas basis for maize systems in this region.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)156-166
Number of pages11
JournalField Crops Research
Volume199
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2016

Fingerprint

drainage
nitrogen
maize
corn
loss
crop
nutrient loss
silt loam soils
clay loam soils
drainage systems
clay loam
meta-analysis
crops
pollution load
surpluses
loam
crop production
crop yield
production system
application rate

Keywords

  • Agricultural drainage N losses
  • N surplus
  • Optimal N rate
  • Precipitation
  • Yield

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Soil Science

Cite this

Assessment of drainage nitrogen losses on a yield-scaled basis. / Zhao, Xu; Christianson, Laura E.; Harmel, Daren; Pittelkow, Cameron M.

In: Field Crops Research, Vol. 199, 01.12.2016, p. 156-166.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zhao, Xu ; Christianson, Laura E. ; Harmel, Daren ; Pittelkow, Cameron M. / Assessment of drainage nitrogen losses on a yield-scaled basis. In: Field Crops Research. 2016 ; Vol. 199. pp. 156-166.
@article{6055b5bd0efc4de69f27fcf8adabf3c3,
title = "Assessment of drainage nitrogen losses on a yield-scaled basis",
abstract = "Subsurface nitrogen (N) losses represent a major environmental concern in agriculture, particularly from fields containing artificial drainage to prevent saturated soil conditions and increase crop production. To develop sustainable intensification strategies and achieve high yields with minimal environmental impacts, N losses are increasingly evaluated with respect to crop productivity on a “yield-scaled” basis, yet little information is available to address the current challenge of balancing crop yields and drainage N losses from intensive maize production systems in the U.S. Midwest by using this metric. In the present study, a meta-analysis was conducted using 31 studies with 381 observations from a publicly available nutrient loss drainage database (Measured Annual Nutrient loads from Agricultural Environments, MANAGE) to address this issue. Results showed that increasing N rates enhanced yields but had weak effects on area- and yield-scaled drainage N losses. In contrast, yield-scaled drainage N losses responded exponentially to N surplus (estimated as N application rate minus above-ground crop N uptake). Relative precipitation during the drainage monitoring period strongly influenced area- and yield-scaled drainage N losses. Maize-soybean rotations and silt loam soils had lower yield-scaled drainage N losses compared to continuous maize and clay loam soils, respectively, whereas tillage practices had little impact on yield-scaled drainage N losses. To meet the growing challenge of achieving high yields with minimal impacts on water quality, these results suggest that evaluating drainage N losses on a yield-scaled basis may complement the more conventional approach of evaluating N losses on an areas basis for maize systems in this region.",
keywords = "Agricultural drainage N losses, N surplus, Optimal N rate, Precipitation, Yield",
author = "Xu Zhao and Christianson, {Laura E.} and Daren Harmel and Pittelkow, {Cameron M.}",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.fcr.2016.07.015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "199",
pages = "156--166",
journal = "Field Crops Research",
issn = "0378-4290",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of drainage nitrogen losses on a yield-scaled basis

AU - Zhao, Xu

AU - Christianson, Laura E.

AU - Harmel, Daren

AU - Pittelkow, Cameron M.

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - Subsurface nitrogen (N) losses represent a major environmental concern in agriculture, particularly from fields containing artificial drainage to prevent saturated soil conditions and increase crop production. To develop sustainable intensification strategies and achieve high yields with minimal environmental impacts, N losses are increasingly evaluated with respect to crop productivity on a “yield-scaled” basis, yet little information is available to address the current challenge of balancing crop yields and drainage N losses from intensive maize production systems in the U.S. Midwest by using this metric. In the present study, a meta-analysis was conducted using 31 studies with 381 observations from a publicly available nutrient loss drainage database (Measured Annual Nutrient loads from Agricultural Environments, MANAGE) to address this issue. Results showed that increasing N rates enhanced yields but had weak effects on area- and yield-scaled drainage N losses. In contrast, yield-scaled drainage N losses responded exponentially to N surplus (estimated as N application rate minus above-ground crop N uptake). Relative precipitation during the drainage monitoring period strongly influenced area- and yield-scaled drainage N losses. Maize-soybean rotations and silt loam soils had lower yield-scaled drainage N losses compared to continuous maize and clay loam soils, respectively, whereas tillage practices had little impact on yield-scaled drainage N losses. To meet the growing challenge of achieving high yields with minimal impacts on water quality, these results suggest that evaluating drainage N losses on a yield-scaled basis may complement the more conventional approach of evaluating N losses on an areas basis for maize systems in this region.

AB - Subsurface nitrogen (N) losses represent a major environmental concern in agriculture, particularly from fields containing artificial drainage to prevent saturated soil conditions and increase crop production. To develop sustainable intensification strategies and achieve high yields with minimal environmental impacts, N losses are increasingly evaluated with respect to crop productivity on a “yield-scaled” basis, yet little information is available to address the current challenge of balancing crop yields and drainage N losses from intensive maize production systems in the U.S. Midwest by using this metric. In the present study, a meta-analysis was conducted using 31 studies with 381 observations from a publicly available nutrient loss drainage database (Measured Annual Nutrient loads from Agricultural Environments, MANAGE) to address this issue. Results showed that increasing N rates enhanced yields but had weak effects on area- and yield-scaled drainage N losses. In contrast, yield-scaled drainage N losses responded exponentially to N surplus (estimated as N application rate minus above-ground crop N uptake). Relative precipitation during the drainage monitoring period strongly influenced area- and yield-scaled drainage N losses. Maize-soybean rotations and silt loam soils had lower yield-scaled drainage N losses compared to continuous maize and clay loam soils, respectively, whereas tillage practices had little impact on yield-scaled drainage N losses. To meet the growing challenge of achieving high yields with minimal impacts on water quality, these results suggest that evaluating drainage N losses on a yield-scaled basis may complement the more conventional approach of evaluating N losses on an areas basis for maize systems in this region.

KW - Agricultural drainage N losses

KW - N surplus

KW - Optimal N rate

KW - Precipitation

KW - Yield

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84991508623&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84991508623&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.07.015

DO - 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.07.015

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84991508623

VL - 199

SP - 156

EP - 166

JO - Field Crops Research

JF - Field Crops Research

SN - 0378-4290

ER -