Assessing the impact of electrolyte conductivity and viscosity on the reactor cost and pressure drop of redox-active polymer flow batteries

Vinay A. Iyer, Jonathon K. Schuh, Elena C. Montoto, V. Pavan Nemani, Shaoyi Qian, Gavvalapalli Nagarjuna, Joaquin Rodriguez Lopez, Randy H Ewoldt, Kyle C Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Redox-active small molecules, used traditionally in redox flow batteries (RFBs), are susceptible to crossover and require expensive ion exchange membranes (IEMs) to achieve long lifetimes. Redox-active polymer (RAP) solutions show promise as candidate electrolytes to mitigate crossover through size-exclusion, enabling the use of porous separators instead of IEMs. Here, poly(vinylbenzyl ethyl viologen) is studied as a surrogate RAP for RFBs. For oxidized RAPs, ionic conductivity varies weakly between 1.6 and 2.1 S m−1 for RAP concentrations of 0.13–1.27 mol kg−1 (monomeric repeat unit per kg solvent) and 0.32 mol kg−1 LiBF4 with a minor increase upon reduction. In contrast, viscosity varies between 1.8 and 184.0 mPa s over the same concentration range with weakly shear-thinning rheology independent of oxidation state. Techno-economic analysis is used to quantify reactor cost as a function of electrolyte transport properties for RAP concentrations of 0.13–1.27 mol kg−1, assuming a hypothetical 3V cell and facile kinetics. Among these concentrations, reactor cost is minimized over a current density range of 600–1000 A m−2 with minimum reactor cost between $11–17 per kWh, and pumping pressures below 10 kPa. The predicted low reactor cost of RAP RFBs is enabled by sustained ionic mobility in spite of the high viscosity of concentrated RAP solutions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)334-344
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Power Sources
Volume361
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

pressure drop
Electrolytes
Pressure drop
electric batteries
Polymers
reactors
electrolytes
Viscosity
viscosity
costs
conductivity
polymers
Costs
Ion exchange membranes
Polymer solutions
Viologens
Shear thinning
crossovers
Economic analysis
Ionic conductivity

Keywords

  • Energy storage
  • Reactor cost
  • Redox flow battery
  • Redox-active polymer
  • Rheology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Cite this

Assessing the impact of electrolyte conductivity and viscosity on the reactor cost and pressure drop of redox-active polymer flow batteries. / Iyer, Vinay A.; Schuh, Jonathon K.; Montoto, Elena C.; Pavan Nemani, V.; Qian, Shaoyi; Nagarjuna, Gavvalapalli; Rodriguez Lopez, Joaquin; Ewoldt, Randy H; Smith, Kyle C.

In: Journal of Power Sources, Vol. 361, 01.01.2017, p. 334-344.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Iyer, Vinay A. ; Schuh, Jonathon K. ; Montoto, Elena C. ; Pavan Nemani, V. ; Qian, Shaoyi ; Nagarjuna, Gavvalapalli ; Rodriguez Lopez, Joaquin ; Ewoldt, Randy H ; Smith, Kyle C. / Assessing the impact of electrolyte conductivity and viscosity on the reactor cost and pressure drop of redox-active polymer flow batteries. In: Journal of Power Sources. 2017 ; Vol. 361. pp. 334-344.
@article{f22a7b015bce4de4ac73564cee64c762,
title = "Assessing the impact of electrolyte conductivity and viscosity on the reactor cost and pressure drop of redox-active polymer flow batteries",
abstract = "Redox-active small molecules, used traditionally in redox flow batteries (RFBs), are susceptible to crossover and require expensive ion exchange membranes (IEMs) to achieve long lifetimes. Redox-active polymer (RAP) solutions show promise as candidate electrolytes to mitigate crossover through size-exclusion, enabling the use of porous separators instead of IEMs. Here, poly(vinylbenzyl ethyl viologen) is studied as a surrogate RAP for RFBs. For oxidized RAPs, ionic conductivity varies weakly between 1.6 and 2.1 S m−1 for RAP concentrations of 0.13–1.27 mol kg−1 (monomeric repeat unit per kg solvent) and 0.32 mol kg−1 LiBF4 with a minor increase upon reduction. In contrast, viscosity varies between 1.8 and 184.0 mPa s over the same concentration range with weakly shear-thinning rheology independent of oxidation state. Techno-economic analysis is used to quantify reactor cost as a function of electrolyte transport properties for RAP concentrations of 0.13–1.27 mol kg−1, assuming a hypothetical 3V cell and facile kinetics. Among these concentrations, reactor cost is minimized over a current density range of 600–1000 A m−2 with minimum reactor cost between $11–17 per kWh, and pumping pressures below 10 kPa. The predicted low reactor cost of RAP RFBs is enabled by sustained ionic mobility in spite of the high viscosity of concentrated RAP solutions.",
keywords = "Energy storage, Reactor cost, Redox flow battery, Redox-active polymer, Rheology",
author = "Iyer, {Vinay A.} and Schuh, {Jonathon K.} and Montoto, {Elena C.} and {Pavan Nemani}, V. and Shaoyi Qian and Gavvalapalli Nagarjuna and {Rodriguez Lopez}, Joaquin and Ewoldt, {Randy H} and Smith, {Kyle C}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.06.052",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "361",
pages = "334--344",
journal = "Journal of Power Sources",
issn = "0378-7753",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the impact of electrolyte conductivity and viscosity on the reactor cost and pressure drop of redox-active polymer flow batteries

AU - Iyer, Vinay A.

AU - Schuh, Jonathon K.

AU - Montoto, Elena C.

AU - Pavan Nemani, V.

AU - Qian, Shaoyi

AU - Nagarjuna, Gavvalapalli

AU - Rodriguez Lopez, Joaquin

AU - Ewoldt, Randy H

AU - Smith, Kyle C

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Redox-active small molecules, used traditionally in redox flow batteries (RFBs), are susceptible to crossover and require expensive ion exchange membranes (IEMs) to achieve long lifetimes. Redox-active polymer (RAP) solutions show promise as candidate electrolytes to mitigate crossover through size-exclusion, enabling the use of porous separators instead of IEMs. Here, poly(vinylbenzyl ethyl viologen) is studied as a surrogate RAP for RFBs. For oxidized RAPs, ionic conductivity varies weakly between 1.6 and 2.1 S m−1 for RAP concentrations of 0.13–1.27 mol kg−1 (monomeric repeat unit per kg solvent) and 0.32 mol kg−1 LiBF4 with a minor increase upon reduction. In contrast, viscosity varies between 1.8 and 184.0 mPa s over the same concentration range with weakly shear-thinning rheology independent of oxidation state. Techno-economic analysis is used to quantify reactor cost as a function of electrolyte transport properties for RAP concentrations of 0.13–1.27 mol kg−1, assuming a hypothetical 3V cell and facile kinetics. Among these concentrations, reactor cost is minimized over a current density range of 600–1000 A m−2 with minimum reactor cost between $11–17 per kWh, and pumping pressures below 10 kPa. The predicted low reactor cost of RAP RFBs is enabled by sustained ionic mobility in spite of the high viscosity of concentrated RAP solutions.

AB - Redox-active small molecules, used traditionally in redox flow batteries (RFBs), are susceptible to crossover and require expensive ion exchange membranes (IEMs) to achieve long lifetimes. Redox-active polymer (RAP) solutions show promise as candidate electrolytes to mitigate crossover through size-exclusion, enabling the use of porous separators instead of IEMs. Here, poly(vinylbenzyl ethyl viologen) is studied as a surrogate RAP for RFBs. For oxidized RAPs, ionic conductivity varies weakly between 1.6 and 2.1 S m−1 for RAP concentrations of 0.13–1.27 mol kg−1 (monomeric repeat unit per kg solvent) and 0.32 mol kg−1 LiBF4 with a minor increase upon reduction. In contrast, viscosity varies between 1.8 and 184.0 mPa s over the same concentration range with weakly shear-thinning rheology independent of oxidation state. Techno-economic analysis is used to quantify reactor cost as a function of electrolyte transport properties for RAP concentrations of 0.13–1.27 mol kg−1, assuming a hypothetical 3V cell and facile kinetics. Among these concentrations, reactor cost is minimized over a current density range of 600–1000 A m−2 with minimum reactor cost between $11–17 per kWh, and pumping pressures below 10 kPa. The predicted low reactor cost of RAP RFBs is enabled by sustained ionic mobility in spite of the high viscosity of concentrated RAP solutions.

KW - Energy storage

KW - Reactor cost

KW - Redox flow battery

KW - Redox-active polymer

KW - Rheology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021816960&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021816960&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.06.052

DO - 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.06.052

M3 - Article

VL - 361

SP - 334

EP - 344

JO - Journal of Power Sources

JF - Journal of Power Sources

SN - 0378-7753

ER -