Assessing Postural Instability and Cybersickness Through Linear and Angular Displacement

Christopher Widdowson, Israel Becerra, Cameron Merrill, Ranxiao Frances Wang, Steven LaValle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To examine the hypothesis that constant speed is more comfortable than variable speed profiles and may minimize cybersickness. Background: Current best practices for virtual reality (VR) content creation suggest keeping any form of acceleration as short and infrequent as possible to mitigate cybersickness. Methods: In Experiment 1, participants experienced repetitions of simulated linear motion, and in Experiment 2, they experienced repetitions of a circular motion. Three speed profiles were tested in each experiment. Each trial lasted 2 min while standing. Cybersickness was measured using the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ) and operationally defined in terms of total severity scores. Postural stability was measured using a Wii Balance Board and operationally defined in terms of center of pressure (COP) path length. Postural measures were decomposed into anterior-posterior and medial-lateral axes and subjected to detrended fluctuation analysis. Results: For both experiments, no significant differences were observed between the three speed profiles in terms of cybersickness or postural stability, and none of the baseline postural measures could predict SSQ scores for the speed profile conditions. An axis effect was observed in both experiments such that normalized COP movement was significantly greater along the anterior-posterior axis than the medial-lateral axis. Conclusion: Results showed no convincing evidence to support the common belief that constant speed is more comfortable than variable speed profiles for scenarios typical of VR applications. Application: The present findings offer guidelines for the design of locomotion techniques involving traversal in VR environments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalHuman Factors
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Pressure
Locomotion
Practice Guidelines
virtual reality
Virtual reality
experiment
Guidelines
Experiments
illness
Simulators
questionnaire
Surveys and Questionnaires
fluctuation
best practice
scenario
evidence

Keywords

  • gait
  • immersive environments
  • motion sickness
  • posture
  • simulator sickness
  • virtual environments

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Applied Psychology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Assessing Postural Instability and Cybersickness Through Linear and Angular Displacement. / Widdowson, Christopher; Becerra, Israel; Merrill, Cameron; Wang, Ranxiao Frances; LaValle, Steven.

In: Human Factors, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Widdowson, Christopher ; Becerra, Israel ; Merrill, Cameron ; Wang, Ranxiao Frances ; LaValle, Steven. / Assessing Postural Instability and Cybersickness Through Linear and Angular Displacement. In: Human Factors. 2019.
@article{d84c3590742a4f31b12bfc95e68e95c1,
title = "Assessing Postural Instability and Cybersickness Through Linear and Angular Displacement",
abstract = "Objective: To examine the hypothesis that constant speed is more comfortable than variable speed profiles and may minimize cybersickness. Background: Current best practices for virtual reality (VR) content creation suggest keeping any form of acceleration as short and infrequent as possible to mitigate cybersickness. Methods: In Experiment 1, participants experienced repetitions of simulated linear motion, and in Experiment 2, they experienced repetitions of a circular motion. Three speed profiles were tested in each experiment. Each trial lasted 2 min while standing. Cybersickness was measured using the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ) and operationally defined in terms of total severity scores. Postural stability was measured using a Wii Balance Board and operationally defined in terms of center of pressure (COP) path length. Postural measures were decomposed into anterior-posterior and medial-lateral axes and subjected to detrended fluctuation analysis. Results: For both experiments, no significant differences were observed between the three speed profiles in terms of cybersickness or postural stability, and none of the baseline postural measures could predict SSQ scores for the speed profile conditions. An axis effect was observed in both experiments such that normalized COP movement was significantly greater along the anterior-posterior axis than the medial-lateral axis. Conclusion: Results showed no convincing evidence to support the common belief that constant speed is more comfortable than variable speed profiles for scenarios typical of VR applications. Application: The present findings offer guidelines for the design of locomotion techniques involving traversal in VR environments.",
keywords = "gait, immersive environments, motion sickness, posture, simulator sickness, virtual environments",
author = "Christopher Widdowson and Israel Becerra and Cameron Merrill and Wang, {Ranxiao Frances} and Steven LaValle",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0018720819881254",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Human Factors",
issn = "0018-7208",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing Postural Instability and Cybersickness Through Linear and Angular Displacement

AU - Widdowson, Christopher

AU - Becerra, Israel

AU - Merrill, Cameron

AU - Wang, Ranxiao Frances

AU - LaValle, Steven

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Objective: To examine the hypothesis that constant speed is more comfortable than variable speed profiles and may minimize cybersickness. Background: Current best practices for virtual reality (VR) content creation suggest keeping any form of acceleration as short and infrequent as possible to mitigate cybersickness. Methods: In Experiment 1, participants experienced repetitions of simulated linear motion, and in Experiment 2, they experienced repetitions of a circular motion. Three speed profiles were tested in each experiment. Each trial lasted 2 min while standing. Cybersickness was measured using the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ) and operationally defined in terms of total severity scores. Postural stability was measured using a Wii Balance Board and operationally defined in terms of center of pressure (COP) path length. Postural measures were decomposed into anterior-posterior and medial-lateral axes and subjected to detrended fluctuation analysis. Results: For both experiments, no significant differences were observed between the three speed profiles in terms of cybersickness or postural stability, and none of the baseline postural measures could predict SSQ scores for the speed profile conditions. An axis effect was observed in both experiments such that normalized COP movement was significantly greater along the anterior-posterior axis than the medial-lateral axis. Conclusion: Results showed no convincing evidence to support the common belief that constant speed is more comfortable than variable speed profiles for scenarios typical of VR applications. Application: The present findings offer guidelines for the design of locomotion techniques involving traversal in VR environments.

AB - Objective: To examine the hypothesis that constant speed is more comfortable than variable speed profiles and may minimize cybersickness. Background: Current best practices for virtual reality (VR) content creation suggest keeping any form of acceleration as short and infrequent as possible to mitigate cybersickness. Methods: In Experiment 1, participants experienced repetitions of simulated linear motion, and in Experiment 2, they experienced repetitions of a circular motion. Three speed profiles were tested in each experiment. Each trial lasted 2 min while standing. Cybersickness was measured using the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ) and operationally defined in terms of total severity scores. Postural stability was measured using a Wii Balance Board and operationally defined in terms of center of pressure (COP) path length. Postural measures were decomposed into anterior-posterior and medial-lateral axes and subjected to detrended fluctuation analysis. Results: For both experiments, no significant differences were observed between the three speed profiles in terms of cybersickness or postural stability, and none of the baseline postural measures could predict SSQ scores for the speed profile conditions. An axis effect was observed in both experiments such that normalized COP movement was significantly greater along the anterior-posterior axis than the medial-lateral axis. Conclusion: Results showed no convincing evidence to support the common belief that constant speed is more comfortable than variable speed profiles for scenarios typical of VR applications. Application: The present findings offer guidelines for the design of locomotion techniques involving traversal in VR environments.

KW - gait

KW - immersive environments

KW - motion sickness

KW - posture

KW - simulator sickness

KW - virtual environments

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076466869&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85076466869&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0018720819881254

DO - 10.1177/0018720819881254

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85076466869

JO - Human Factors

JF - Human Factors

SN - 0018-7208

ER -