TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessing intermediate left main coronary lesions using intravascular ultrasound
AU - Sano, Koichi
AU - Mintz, Gary S.
AU - Carlier, Stéphane G.
AU - de Ribamar Costa, Jose
AU - Qian, Jie
AU - Missel, Eduardo
AU - Shan, Shoujie
AU - Franklin-Bond, Theresa
AU - Boland, Paul
AU - Weisz, Giora
AU - Moussa, Issam
AU - Dangas, George D.
AU - Mehran, Roxana
AU - Lansky, Alexandra J.
AU - Kreps, Edward M.
AU - Collins, Michael B.
AU - Stone, Gregg W.
AU - Leon, Martin B.
AU - Moses, Jeffrey W.
PY - 2007/11
Y1 - 2007/11
N2 - Background: Angiographic assessment of a left main coronary artery stenosis (LMCS) is often difficult and unreliable. We aimed to evaluate the severity of ambiguous LMCSs by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and to clarify how frequently significant stenosis occurs in the "real world". Methods: We retrospectively found 115 consecutive patients in our clinical IVUS database with a de novo, angiographically ambiguous, intermediate LMCS who underwent IVUS evaluation. Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and IVUS analyses were performed. We define a significant LMCS as a diameter stenosis >50% by QCA and a minimal lumen area <6.0mm2 by IVUS. Results: Ostial, mid, and distal LMCSs were seen in 44 (38.3%), 6 (5.2%), and 65 (56.5%) lesions. Overall, IVUS minimal lumen area and plaque burden measured 6.8 ± 2.6 mm2 and 63% ± 14%. A significant LMCS was seen in 51 (44.3%) lesions by IVUS but in only 15 (13.0%) lesions by QCA. In particular, only 36.4% of ostial lesions had a significant IVUS stenosis, and minimal lumen diameter by QCA was less well correlated with IVUS in ostial lesions than in other lesion locations. Conclusions: This real-world IVUS analysis showed that less than half of intermediate LMCSs had significant stenoses by IVUS assessment, especially for lesions located at the left main ostium. Such patients deserve IVUS assessment or physiologic assessment before blindly proceeding to revascularization.
AB - Background: Angiographic assessment of a left main coronary artery stenosis (LMCS) is often difficult and unreliable. We aimed to evaluate the severity of ambiguous LMCSs by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and to clarify how frequently significant stenosis occurs in the "real world". Methods: We retrospectively found 115 consecutive patients in our clinical IVUS database with a de novo, angiographically ambiguous, intermediate LMCS who underwent IVUS evaluation. Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and IVUS analyses were performed. We define a significant LMCS as a diameter stenosis >50% by QCA and a minimal lumen area <6.0mm2 by IVUS. Results: Ostial, mid, and distal LMCSs were seen in 44 (38.3%), 6 (5.2%), and 65 (56.5%) lesions. Overall, IVUS minimal lumen area and plaque burden measured 6.8 ± 2.6 mm2 and 63% ± 14%. A significant LMCS was seen in 51 (44.3%) lesions by IVUS but in only 15 (13.0%) lesions by QCA. In particular, only 36.4% of ostial lesions had a significant IVUS stenosis, and minimal lumen diameter by QCA was less well correlated with IVUS in ostial lesions than in other lesion locations. Conclusions: This real-world IVUS analysis showed that less than half of intermediate LMCSs had significant stenoses by IVUS assessment, especially for lesions located at the left main ostium. Such patients deserve IVUS assessment or physiologic assessment before blindly proceeding to revascularization.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35448929111&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35448929111&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.07.001
DO - 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.07.001
M3 - Article
C2 - 17967608
AN - SCOPUS:35448929111
SN - 0002-8703
VL - 154
SP - 983
EP - 988
JO - American Heart Journal
JF - American Heart Journal
IS - 5
ER -