TY - JOUR
T1 - Artificial intelligence framework for simulating clinical decision-making
T2 - A Markov decision process approach
AU - Bennett, Casey C.
AU - Hauser, Kris
N1 - Funding Information:
This research is funded by the Ayers Foundation , the Joe C. Davis Foundation , and Indiana University . The funders had no role in the design, implementation, or analysis of this research. The author would like to acknowledge the support of the following Centerstone Research Institute staff in this work: Dr. Tom Doub, Dr. Dennis Morrison, Dr. April Bragg, and Dr. Rebecca Selove. The opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views of Centerstone, Indiana University, or their affiliates.
PY - 2013/1
Y1 - 2013/1
N2 - Objective: In the modern healthcare system, rapidly expanding costs/complexity, the growing myriad of treatment options, and exploding information streams that often do not effectively reach the front lines hinder the ability to choose optimal treatment decisions over time. The goal in this paper is to develop a general purpose (non-disease-specific) computational/artificial intelligence (AI) framework to address these challenges. This framework serves two potential functions: (1) a simulation environment for exploring various healthcare policies, payment methodologies, etc., and (2) the basis for clinical artificial intelligence - an AI that can " think like a doctor" Methods: This approach combines Markov decision processes and dynamic decision networks to learn from clinical data and develop complex plans via simulation of alternative sequential decision paths while capturing the sometimes conflicting, sometimes synergistic interactions of various components in the healthcare system. It can operate in partially observable environments (in the case of missing observations or data) by maintaining belief states about patient health status and functions as an online agent that plans and re-plans as actions are performed and new observations are obtained. This framework was evaluated using real patient data from an electronic health record. Results: The results demonstrate the feasibility of this approach; such an AI framework easily outperforms the current treatment-as-usual (TAU) case-rate/fee-for-service models of healthcare. The cost per unit of outcome change (CPUC) was $189 vs $497 for AI vs. TAU (where lower is considered optimal) - while at the same time the AI approach could obtain a 30-35% increase in patient outcomes. Tweaking certain AI model parameters could further enhance this advantage, obtaining approximately 50% more improvement (outcome change) for roughly half the costs. Conclusion: Given careful design and problem formulation, an AI simulation framework can approximate optimal decisions even in complex and uncertain environments. Future work is described that outlines potential lines of research and integration of machine learning algorithms for personalized medicine.
AB - Objective: In the modern healthcare system, rapidly expanding costs/complexity, the growing myriad of treatment options, and exploding information streams that often do not effectively reach the front lines hinder the ability to choose optimal treatment decisions over time. The goal in this paper is to develop a general purpose (non-disease-specific) computational/artificial intelligence (AI) framework to address these challenges. This framework serves two potential functions: (1) a simulation environment for exploring various healthcare policies, payment methodologies, etc., and (2) the basis for clinical artificial intelligence - an AI that can " think like a doctor" Methods: This approach combines Markov decision processes and dynamic decision networks to learn from clinical data and develop complex plans via simulation of alternative sequential decision paths while capturing the sometimes conflicting, sometimes synergistic interactions of various components in the healthcare system. It can operate in partially observable environments (in the case of missing observations or data) by maintaining belief states about patient health status and functions as an online agent that plans and re-plans as actions are performed and new observations are obtained. This framework was evaluated using real patient data from an electronic health record. Results: The results demonstrate the feasibility of this approach; such an AI framework easily outperforms the current treatment-as-usual (TAU) case-rate/fee-for-service models of healthcare. The cost per unit of outcome change (CPUC) was $189 vs $497 for AI vs. TAU (where lower is considered optimal) - while at the same time the AI approach could obtain a 30-35% increase in patient outcomes. Tweaking certain AI model parameters could further enhance this advantage, obtaining approximately 50% more improvement (outcome change) for roughly half the costs. Conclusion: Given careful design and problem formulation, an AI simulation framework can approximate optimal decisions even in complex and uncertain environments. Future work is described that outlines potential lines of research and integration of machine learning algorithms for personalized medicine.
KW - Chronic illness
KW - Clinical artificial intelligence
KW - Dynamic decision network
KW - Markov decision process
KW - Medical decision making
KW - Multi-agent system
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875271177&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875271177&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.artmed.2012.12.003
DO - 10.1016/j.artmed.2012.12.003
M3 - Article
C2 - 23287490
AN - SCOPUS:84875271177
SN - 0933-3657
VL - 57
SP - 9
EP - 19
JO - Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
JF - Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
IS - 1
ER -