TY - JOUR
T1 - Artificial intelligence for education
T2 - Knowledge and its assessment in AI-enabled learning ecologies
AU - Cope, Bill
AU - Kalantzis, Mary
AU - Searsmith, Duane
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Philosophy of Education Society of Australasia.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Over the past ten years, we have worked in a collaboration between educators and computer scientists at the University of Illinois to imagine futures for education in the context of what is loosely called “artificial intelligence.” Unhappy with the first generation of digital learning environments, our agenda has been to design alternatives and research their implementation. Our starting point has been to ask, what is the nature of machine intelligence, and what are its limits and potentials in education? This paper offers some tentative answers, first conceptually, and then practically in an overview of the results of a number of experimental implementations documented in greater detail elsewhere. Our key finding is that artificial intelligence—in the context of the practices of electronic computing developing over the past three quarters of a century—will never in any sense “take over” the role of teacher, because how it works and what it does are so profoundly different from human intelligence. However, within the limits that we describe in this paper, it offers the potential to transform education in ways that—counterintuitively perhaps—make education more human, not less.
AB - Over the past ten years, we have worked in a collaboration between educators and computer scientists at the University of Illinois to imagine futures for education in the context of what is loosely called “artificial intelligence.” Unhappy with the first generation of digital learning environments, our agenda has been to design alternatives and research their implementation. Our starting point has been to ask, what is the nature of machine intelligence, and what are its limits and potentials in education? This paper offers some tentative answers, first conceptually, and then practically in an overview of the results of a number of experimental implementations documented in greater detail elsewhere. Our key finding is that artificial intelligence—in the context of the practices of electronic computing developing over the past three quarters of a century—will never in any sense “take over” the role of teacher, because how it works and what it does are so profoundly different from human intelligence. However, within the limits that we describe in this paper, it offers the potential to transform education in ways that—counterintuitively perhaps—make education more human, not less.
KW - Artificial intelligence
KW - assessment
KW - e-learning
KW - pedagogy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85079717342&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85079717342&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00131857.2020.1728732
DO - 10.1080/00131857.2020.1728732
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85079717342
SN - 0013-1857
VL - 53
SP - 1229
EP - 1245
JO - Educational Philosophy and Theory
JF - Educational Philosophy and Theory
IS - 12
ER -