Argumentation Mining

Manfred Stede, Jodi A Schneider

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Argumentation mining is an application of natural language processing (NLP) that emerged a few years ago and has recently enjoyed considerable popularity, as demonstrated by a series of international workshops and by a rising number of publications at the major conferences and journals of the field. Its goals are to identify argumentation in text or dialogue; to construct representations of the constellation of claims, supporting and attacking moves (in different levels of detail); and to characterize the patterns of reasoning that appear to license the argumentation. Furthermore, recent work also addresses the difficult tasks of evaluating the persuasiveness and quality of arguments. Some of the linguistic genres that are being studied include legal text, student essays, political discourse and debate, newspaper editorials, scientific writing, and others. The book starts with a discussion of the linguistic perspective, characteristics of argumentative language, and their relationship to certain other notions such as subjectivity. Besides the connection to linguistics, argumentation has for a long time been a topic in Artificial Intelligence, where the focus is on devising adequate representations and reasoning formalisms that capture the properties of argumentative exchange. It is generally very difficult to connect the two realms of reasoning and text analysis, but we are convinced that it should be attempted in the long term, and therefore we also touch upon some fundamentals of reasoning approaches. Then the book turns to its focus, the computational side of mining argumentation in text. We first introduce a number of annotated corpora that have been used in the research. From the NLP perspective, argumentation mining shares subtasks with research fields such as subjectivity and sentiment analysis, semantic relation extraction, and discourse parsing. Therefore, many technical approaches are being borrowed from those (and other) fields. We break argumentation mining into a series of subtasks, starting with the preparatory steps of classifying text as argumentative (or not) and segmenting it into elementary units. Then, central steps are the automatic identification of claims, and finding statements that support or oppose the claim. For certain applications, it is also of interest to compute a full structure of an argumentative constellation of statements. Next, we discuss a few steps that try to 'dig deeper': to infer the underlying reasoning pattern for a textual argument, to reconstruct unstated premises (so-called 'enthymemes'), and to evaluate the quality of the argumentation. We also take a brief look at 'the other side' of mining, i.e., the generation or synthesis of argumentative text. The book finishes with a summary of the argumentation mining tasks, a sketch of potential applications, and a-necessarily subjective-outlook for the field.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationSynthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies
Subtitle of host publicationLecture #39
PublisherMorgan and Claypool Publishers
Pages1-191
Number of pages191
Edition2
ISBN (Electronic)9781681734590
ISBN (Print)9781681733739
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 20 2018

Publication series

NameSynthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies
Number2
Volume11
ISSN (Electronic)1947-4040

Fingerprint

argumentation
Linguistics
linguistics
subjectivity
Processing
language
Artificial intelligence
text analysis
discourse
Semantics
artificial intelligence
Students
field research
license
popularity
genre
newspaper
dialogue
semantics

Keywords

  • argument models
  • argumentation mining
  • argumentative language
  • claim detection
  • enthymemes %generating argumentative text
  • evidence detection
  • natural language processing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Linguistics and Language
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Computer Networks and Communications

Cite this

Stede, M., & Schneider, J. A. (2018). Argumentation Mining. In Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies: Lecture #39 (2 ed., pp. 1-191). (Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies; Vol. 11, No. 2). Morgan and Claypool Publishers. https://doi.org/10.2200/S00883ED1V01Y201811HLT040

Argumentation Mining. / Stede, Manfred; Schneider, Jodi A.

Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies: Lecture #39. 2. ed. Morgan and Claypool Publishers, 2018. p. 1-191 (Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies; Vol. 11, No. 2).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Stede, M & Schneider, JA 2018, Argumentation Mining. in Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies: Lecture #39. 2 edn, Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies, no. 2, vol. 11, Morgan and Claypool Publishers, pp. 1-191. https://doi.org/10.2200/S00883ED1V01Y201811HLT040
Stede M, Schneider JA. Argumentation Mining. In Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies: Lecture #39. 2 ed. Morgan and Claypool Publishers. 2018. p. 1-191. (Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies; 2). https://doi.org/10.2200/S00883ED1V01Y201811HLT040
Stede, Manfred ; Schneider, Jodi A. / Argumentation Mining. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies: Lecture #39. 2. ed. Morgan and Claypool Publishers, 2018. pp. 1-191 (Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies; 2).
@inbook{fee3746eb4ca44fd83d6e1aaa8e74b7a,
title = "Argumentation Mining",
abstract = "Argumentation mining is an application of natural language processing (NLP) that emerged a few years ago and has recently enjoyed considerable popularity, as demonstrated by a series of international workshops and by a rising number of publications at the major conferences and journals of the field. Its goals are to identify argumentation in text or dialogue; to construct representations of the constellation of claims, supporting and attacking moves (in different levels of detail); and to characterize the patterns of reasoning that appear to license the argumentation. Furthermore, recent work also addresses the difficult tasks of evaluating the persuasiveness and quality of arguments. Some of the linguistic genres that are being studied include legal text, student essays, political discourse and debate, newspaper editorials, scientific writing, and others. The book starts with a discussion of the linguistic perspective, characteristics of argumentative language, and their relationship to certain other notions such as subjectivity. Besides the connection to linguistics, argumentation has for a long time been a topic in Artificial Intelligence, where the focus is on devising adequate representations and reasoning formalisms that capture the properties of argumentative exchange. It is generally very difficult to connect the two realms of reasoning and text analysis, but we are convinced that it should be attempted in the long term, and therefore we also touch upon some fundamentals of reasoning approaches. Then the book turns to its focus, the computational side of mining argumentation in text. We first introduce a number of annotated corpora that have been used in the research. From the NLP perspective, argumentation mining shares subtasks with research fields such as subjectivity and sentiment analysis, semantic relation extraction, and discourse parsing. Therefore, many technical approaches are being borrowed from those (and other) fields. We break argumentation mining into a series of subtasks, starting with the preparatory steps of classifying text as argumentative (or not) and segmenting it into elementary units. Then, central steps are the automatic identification of claims, and finding statements that support or oppose the claim. For certain applications, it is also of interest to compute a full structure of an argumentative constellation of statements. Next, we discuss a few steps that try to 'dig deeper': to infer the underlying reasoning pattern for a textual argument, to reconstruct unstated premises (so-called 'enthymemes'), and to evaluate the quality of the argumentation. We also take a brief look at 'the other side' of mining, i.e., the generation or synthesis of argumentative text. The book finishes with a summary of the argumentation mining tasks, a sketch of potential applications, and a-necessarily subjective-outlook for the field.",
keywords = "argument models, argumentation mining, argumentative language, claim detection, enthymemes {\%}generating argumentative text, evidence detection, natural language processing",
author = "Manfred Stede and Schneider, {Jodi A}",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "20",
doi = "10.2200/S00883ED1V01Y201811HLT040",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781681733739",
series = "Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies",
publisher = "Morgan and Claypool Publishers",
number = "2",
pages = "1--191",
booktitle = "Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies",
address = "United States",
edition = "2",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Argumentation Mining

AU - Stede, Manfred

AU - Schneider, Jodi A

PY - 2018/12/20

Y1 - 2018/12/20

N2 - Argumentation mining is an application of natural language processing (NLP) that emerged a few years ago and has recently enjoyed considerable popularity, as demonstrated by a series of international workshops and by a rising number of publications at the major conferences and journals of the field. Its goals are to identify argumentation in text or dialogue; to construct representations of the constellation of claims, supporting and attacking moves (in different levels of detail); and to characterize the patterns of reasoning that appear to license the argumentation. Furthermore, recent work also addresses the difficult tasks of evaluating the persuasiveness and quality of arguments. Some of the linguistic genres that are being studied include legal text, student essays, political discourse and debate, newspaper editorials, scientific writing, and others. The book starts with a discussion of the linguistic perspective, characteristics of argumentative language, and their relationship to certain other notions such as subjectivity. Besides the connection to linguistics, argumentation has for a long time been a topic in Artificial Intelligence, where the focus is on devising adequate representations and reasoning formalisms that capture the properties of argumentative exchange. It is generally very difficult to connect the two realms of reasoning and text analysis, but we are convinced that it should be attempted in the long term, and therefore we also touch upon some fundamentals of reasoning approaches. Then the book turns to its focus, the computational side of mining argumentation in text. We first introduce a number of annotated corpora that have been used in the research. From the NLP perspective, argumentation mining shares subtasks with research fields such as subjectivity and sentiment analysis, semantic relation extraction, and discourse parsing. Therefore, many technical approaches are being borrowed from those (and other) fields. We break argumentation mining into a series of subtasks, starting with the preparatory steps of classifying text as argumentative (or not) and segmenting it into elementary units. Then, central steps are the automatic identification of claims, and finding statements that support or oppose the claim. For certain applications, it is also of interest to compute a full structure of an argumentative constellation of statements. Next, we discuss a few steps that try to 'dig deeper': to infer the underlying reasoning pattern for a textual argument, to reconstruct unstated premises (so-called 'enthymemes'), and to evaluate the quality of the argumentation. We also take a brief look at 'the other side' of mining, i.e., the generation or synthesis of argumentative text. The book finishes with a summary of the argumentation mining tasks, a sketch of potential applications, and a-necessarily subjective-outlook for the field.

AB - Argumentation mining is an application of natural language processing (NLP) that emerged a few years ago and has recently enjoyed considerable popularity, as demonstrated by a series of international workshops and by a rising number of publications at the major conferences and journals of the field. Its goals are to identify argumentation in text or dialogue; to construct representations of the constellation of claims, supporting and attacking moves (in different levels of detail); and to characterize the patterns of reasoning that appear to license the argumentation. Furthermore, recent work also addresses the difficult tasks of evaluating the persuasiveness and quality of arguments. Some of the linguistic genres that are being studied include legal text, student essays, political discourse and debate, newspaper editorials, scientific writing, and others. The book starts with a discussion of the linguistic perspective, characteristics of argumentative language, and their relationship to certain other notions such as subjectivity. Besides the connection to linguistics, argumentation has for a long time been a topic in Artificial Intelligence, where the focus is on devising adequate representations and reasoning formalisms that capture the properties of argumentative exchange. It is generally very difficult to connect the two realms of reasoning and text analysis, but we are convinced that it should be attempted in the long term, and therefore we also touch upon some fundamentals of reasoning approaches. Then the book turns to its focus, the computational side of mining argumentation in text. We first introduce a number of annotated corpora that have been used in the research. From the NLP perspective, argumentation mining shares subtasks with research fields such as subjectivity and sentiment analysis, semantic relation extraction, and discourse parsing. Therefore, many technical approaches are being borrowed from those (and other) fields. We break argumentation mining into a series of subtasks, starting with the preparatory steps of classifying text as argumentative (or not) and segmenting it into elementary units. Then, central steps are the automatic identification of claims, and finding statements that support or oppose the claim. For certain applications, it is also of interest to compute a full structure of an argumentative constellation of statements. Next, we discuss a few steps that try to 'dig deeper': to infer the underlying reasoning pattern for a textual argument, to reconstruct unstated premises (so-called 'enthymemes'), and to evaluate the quality of the argumentation. We also take a brief look at 'the other side' of mining, i.e., the generation or synthesis of argumentative text. The book finishes with a summary of the argumentation mining tasks, a sketch of potential applications, and a-necessarily subjective-outlook for the field.

KW - argument models

KW - argumentation mining

KW - argumentative language

KW - claim detection

KW - enthymemes %generating argumentative text

KW - evidence detection

KW - natural language processing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061332643&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061332643&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2200/S00883ED1V01Y201811HLT040

DO - 10.2200/S00883ED1V01Y201811HLT040

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781681733739

T3 - Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies

SP - 1

EP - 191

BT - Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies

PB - Morgan and Claypool Publishers

ER -