Abstract
Evaluative statements, where some entity has a qualitative attribute, appear widespread in blogs, political discussions, and consumer websites. Such expressions can occur in argumentative settings, where they are the conclusion of an argument. Whether the argument holds depends on the premises that express a user's point of view. Where different users disagree, arguments may arise. There are several ways to represent users, e.g. by values and other parameters. The paper proposes models and argumentation schemes for evaluative expressions, where the arguments and attacks between arguments are relative to a user's model.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 153-167 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | CEUR Workshop Proceedings |
Volume | 918 |
State | Published - 2012 |
Externally published | Yes |
Event | 1st International Conference on Agreement Technologies, AT 2012 - Dubrovnik, Croatia Duration: Oct 15 2012 → Oct 16 2012 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Computer Science