Are USDA Forecasts Optimal? A Systematic Review

Olga Isengildina Massa, Berna Karali, Scott H. Irwin

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to systematically review the literature on United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) forecast evaluation and critically assess their methods and findings. The fundamental characteristics of optimal forecasts are bias, accuracy and efficiency as well as encompassing and informativeness. This review revealed that the findings of these studies can be very different based on the forecasts examined, commodity, sample period, and methodology. Some forecasts performed very well, while others were not very reliable, resulting in forecast specific optimality record. We discuss methodological and empirical contributions of these studies as well as their shortcomings and potential opportunities for future work.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Agricultural and Applied Economics
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2024

Keywords

  • Accuracy
  • bias
  • efficiency
  • encompassing
  • forecast evaluation
  • forecast intervals
  • forecast systems
  • informativeness
  • joint evaluation
  • optimal forecasts
  • public information

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Economics and Econometrics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Are USDA Forecasts Optimal? A Systematic Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this