Are the 100 Best better? An empirical investigation of the relationship between being a "great place to work" and firm performance

Ingrid Smithey Fulmer, Barry Gerhart, Kimberly S. Scott

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

We argue that positive employee relations effectively serves as an intangible and enduring asset, and may, therefore, be a source of sustained competitive advantage at the firm level. We survey a number of measures of firm-level performance and conceptualize how each measure is likely to be affected by highly positive firm-level employee relations. We then empirically investigate whether positive employee relations is related to firm performance, focusing on publicly traded firms included in the "100 Best Companies to Work for in America." The relative performance of these "Best Companies" is examined via comparisons to both companies in the broad market and a group of matched firms. Our analyses suggest that companies on the 100 Best list enjoy not only stable and highly positive workforce attitudes, but also performance advantages over the broad market, and in some cases, over the matched group.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)965-993
Number of pages29
JournalPersonnel Psychology
Volume56
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2003
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Are the 100 Best better? An empirical investigation of the relationship between being a "great place to work" and firm performance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this