Are Soft Skills Enough? Experimental Evidence on Skill Complementarity for College Graduates

Adam Osman, Jamin D. Speer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The authors study how complementarities in skill may affect the returns to vocational training using a randomized controlled trial in Cairo, Egypt. Participants, who were college-educated, were given either a four-week training in soft skills (e.g., grooming, time management), technical skills (e.g., Microsoft programs, English language), or a mix of the two (half of each). Findings show large differences in outcomes between the three treatments. The technical and mixed treatments do best in the short term, raising first-job income by about 15%, relative to the soft skill treatment. In the longer term, the mixed-skill treatment significantly outperforms the other two treatments, giving participants 20–27% higher income. The high returns for this group may come from increased access to jobs that require speaking English, which may be at higher-quality employers. Overall, the results suggest that curriculum details play an important role in the outcomes of vocational training programs and that leveraging skill complementarity can yield tangible benefits.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalILR Review
Early online dateFeb 6 2025
DOIs
StateE-pub ahead of print - Feb 6 2025

Keywords

  • complementarity
  • job training
  • randomized trial
  • soft skills
  • vocational education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Strategy and Management
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Are Soft Skills Enough? Experimental Evidence on Skill Complementarity for College Graduates'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this