Are artificial bird nests effective surrogates for estimating predation on real bird nests? A test with tropical birds

W. Douglas Robinson, Jennifer Nesbitt Styrsky, Jeffrey D Brawn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Artificial bird nests are often used in studying birds whose nests are difficult to find, such as those of many tropical species. Yet the underlying assumption that predation on artificial nests accurately estimates predation on real nests may be invalid. We compared rates at which contents of real and artificial nests were lost to predators in a Panamanian rainforest. We attempted to make artificial nests as realistic as possible by moving real, undamaged nests to species-typical nest sites in a study area where the same species were actively breeding. Characteristics of new sites for the moved nests were statistically similar to nest sites chosen by birds. We baited nests with two quail eggs and monitored them for species-specific incubation periods. Predation on real and artificial nests was dissimilar in three of four species, revealing that predation on artificial nests correlated poorly with predation on real nests. In a fourth species, artificial and real nests were lost at similar rates. The latter result may have occurred by chance, because depredated real nests rarely showed any sign of damage; whereas depredated artificial nests were torn, which suggests that real and artificial nests attracted different predators. Our results indicate that artificial nests, even when built by the species themselves and placed in realistic situations, are poor predictors of real nest success and we caution against their use in the tropics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)843-852
Number of pages10
JournalAuk
Volume122
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2005

Fingerprint

artificial nest
nest
predation
nests
bird
birds
testing
nest site
nesting sites
test
predator
rainforest
predators
incubation
breeding
egg
damage
quails

Keywords

  • Artificial bird nests
  • Daily predation rate
  • Nest predation
  • Panama
  • Tropical forest

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Animal Science and Zoology

Cite this

Are artificial bird nests effective surrogates for estimating predation on real bird nests? A test with tropical birds. / Robinson, W. Douglas; Styrsky, Jennifer Nesbitt; Brawn, Jeffrey D.

In: Auk, Vol. 122, No. 3, 07.2005, p. 843-852.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Robinson, W. Douglas ; Styrsky, Jennifer Nesbitt ; Brawn, Jeffrey D. / Are artificial bird nests effective surrogates for estimating predation on real bird nests? A test with tropical birds. In: Auk. 2005 ; Vol. 122, No. 3. pp. 843-852.
@article{7b87de22f47b4d43ad9400efc898f52f,
title = "Are artificial bird nests effective surrogates for estimating predation on real bird nests? A test with tropical birds",
abstract = "Artificial bird nests are often used in studying birds whose nests are difficult to find, such as those of many tropical species. Yet the underlying assumption that predation on artificial nests accurately estimates predation on real nests may be invalid. We compared rates at which contents of real and artificial nests were lost to predators in a Panamanian rainforest. We attempted to make artificial nests as realistic as possible by moving real, undamaged nests to species-typical nest sites in a study area where the same species were actively breeding. Characteristics of new sites for the moved nests were statistically similar to nest sites chosen by birds. We baited nests with two quail eggs and monitored them for species-specific incubation periods. Predation on real and artificial nests was dissimilar in three of four species, revealing that predation on artificial nests correlated poorly with predation on real nests. In a fourth species, artificial and real nests were lost at similar rates. The latter result may have occurred by chance, because depredated real nests rarely showed any sign of damage; whereas depredated artificial nests were torn, which suggests that real and artificial nests attracted different predators. Our results indicate that artificial nests, even when built by the species themselves and placed in realistic situations, are poor predictors of real nest success and we caution against their use in the tropics.",
keywords = "Artificial bird nests, Daily predation rate, Nest predation, Panama, Tropical forest",
author = "Robinson, {W. Douglas} and Styrsky, {Jennifer Nesbitt} and Brawn, {Jeffrey D}",
year = "2005",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1642/0004-8038(2005)122[0843:AABNES]2.0.CO;2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "122",
pages = "843--852",
journal = "Auk",
issn = "0004-8038",
publisher = "Ornithological Societies of North America",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are artificial bird nests effective surrogates for estimating predation on real bird nests? A test with tropical birds

AU - Robinson, W. Douglas

AU - Styrsky, Jennifer Nesbitt

AU - Brawn, Jeffrey D

PY - 2005/7

Y1 - 2005/7

N2 - Artificial bird nests are often used in studying birds whose nests are difficult to find, such as those of many tropical species. Yet the underlying assumption that predation on artificial nests accurately estimates predation on real nests may be invalid. We compared rates at which contents of real and artificial nests were lost to predators in a Panamanian rainforest. We attempted to make artificial nests as realistic as possible by moving real, undamaged nests to species-typical nest sites in a study area where the same species were actively breeding. Characteristics of new sites for the moved nests were statistically similar to nest sites chosen by birds. We baited nests with two quail eggs and monitored them for species-specific incubation periods. Predation on real and artificial nests was dissimilar in three of four species, revealing that predation on artificial nests correlated poorly with predation on real nests. In a fourth species, artificial and real nests were lost at similar rates. The latter result may have occurred by chance, because depredated real nests rarely showed any sign of damage; whereas depredated artificial nests were torn, which suggests that real and artificial nests attracted different predators. Our results indicate that artificial nests, even when built by the species themselves and placed in realistic situations, are poor predictors of real nest success and we caution against their use in the tropics.

AB - Artificial bird nests are often used in studying birds whose nests are difficult to find, such as those of many tropical species. Yet the underlying assumption that predation on artificial nests accurately estimates predation on real nests may be invalid. We compared rates at which contents of real and artificial nests were lost to predators in a Panamanian rainforest. We attempted to make artificial nests as realistic as possible by moving real, undamaged nests to species-typical nest sites in a study area where the same species were actively breeding. Characteristics of new sites for the moved nests were statistically similar to nest sites chosen by birds. We baited nests with two quail eggs and monitored them for species-specific incubation periods. Predation on real and artificial nests was dissimilar in three of four species, revealing that predation on artificial nests correlated poorly with predation on real nests. In a fourth species, artificial and real nests were lost at similar rates. The latter result may have occurred by chance, because depredated real nests rarely showed any sign of damage; whereas depredated artificial nests were torn, which suggests that real and artificial nests attracted different predators. Our results indicate that artificial nests, even when built by the species themselves and placed in realistic situations, are poor predictors of real nest success and we caution against their use in the tropics.

KW - Artificial bird nests

KW - Daily predation rate

KW - Nest predation

KW - Panama

KW - Tropical forest

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=13844286426&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=13844286426&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1642/0004-8038(2005)122[0843:AABNES]2.0.CO;2

DO - 10.1642/0004-8038(2005)122[0843:AABNES]2.0.CO;2

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:13844286426

VL - 122

SP - 843

EP - 852

JO - Auk

JF - Auk

SN - 0004-8038

IS - 3

ER -