Are adult attachment styles categorical or dimensional? A taxometric analysis of general and relationship-specific attachment orientations

R. Chris Fraley, Nathan W. Hudson, Marie E. Heffernan, Noam Segal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

One of the long-standing debates in the study of adult attachment is whether individual differences are best captured using categorical or continuous models. Although early research suggested that continuous models might be most appropriate, we revisit this issue here because (a) categorical models continue to be widely used in the empirical literature, (b) contemporary models of individual differences raise new questions about the structure of attachment, and (c) methods for addressing the types versus dimensions question have become more sophisticated over time. Analyses based on 2 samples indicate that individual differences appear more consistent with a dimensional rather than a categorical model. This was true with respect to general attachment representations and attachment in specific relationship contexts (e.g., attachment with parents and peers). These findings indicate that dimensional models of attachment style may be better suited for conceptualizing and measuring individual differences across multiple levels of analysis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)354-368
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of personality and social psychology
Volume109
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2015

Keywords

  • Adult attachment
  • Individual differences
  • Types versus dimensions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Are adult attachment styles categorical or dimensional? A taxometric analysis of general and relationship-specific attachment orientations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this