Architecting for innovation

Teemu Koponen; Scott Shenker; Hari Balakrishnan; Nick Feamster; Igor Ganichev; Ali Ghodsi; P. Brighten Godfrey; Nick McKeown; Guru Parulkar; Barath Raghavan; Jennifer Rexford; Somaya Arianfar; Dmitriy Kuptsov

doi:10.1145/2002250.2002256

Architecting for innovation

Teemu Koponen, Scott Shenker, Hari Balakrishnan, Nick Feamster, Igor Ganichev, Ali Ghodsi, P. Brighten Godfrey, Nick McKeown, Guru Parulkar, Barath Raghavan, Jennifer Rexford, Somaya Arianfar, Dmitriy Kuptsov

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

We argue that the biggest problem with the current Internet architecture is not a particular functional deficiency, but its inability to accommodate innovation To address this problem we propose a minimal architectural "framework" in which comprehensive architectures can reside The proposed Framework for Internet Innovation (FII) - which is derived from the simple observation that network interfaces should be extensible and abstract - allows for a diversity of architectures to coexist, communicate, and evolve We demonstrate FII's ability to accommodate diversity and evolution with a detailed examination of how information flows through the architecture and with a skeleton implementation of the relevant interfaces.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	24-36
Number of pages	13
Journal	Computer Communication Review
Volume	41
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1145/2002250.2002256
State	Published - Jul 2011
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

Diversity
Evolution
Innovation
Internet Architecture

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Software
Computer Networks and Communications

Access to Document

10.1145/2002250.2002256

Cite this

Architecting for innovation. / Koponen, Teemu; Shenker, Scott; Balakrishnan, Hari; Feamster, Nick; Ganichev, Igor; Ghodsi, Ali; Godfrey, P. Brighten; McKeown, Nick; Parulkar, Guru; Raghavan, Barath; Rexford, Jennifer; Arianfar, Somaya; Kuptsov, Dmitriy.

In: Computer Communication Review, Vol. 41, No. 3, 07.2011, p. 24-36.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

@article{4a2f52f8fb6d49b58fd9465082f08971,

title = "Architecting for innovation",

abstract = "We argue that the biggest problem with the current Internet architecture is not a particular functional deficiency, but its inability to accommodate innovation To address this problem we propose a minimal architectural {"}framework{"} in which comprehensive architectures can reside The proposed Framework for Internet Innovation (FII) - which is derived from the simple observation that network interfaces should be extensible and abstract - allows for a diversity of architectures to coexist, communicate, and evolve We demonstrate FII's ability to accommodate diversity and evolution with a detailed examination of how information flows through the architecture and with a skeleton implementation of the relevant interfaces.",

keywords = "Diversity, Evolution, Innovation, Internet Architecture",

author = "Teemu Koponen and Scott Shenker and Hari Balakrishnan and Nick Feamster and Igor Ganichev and Ali Ghodsi and Godfrey, {P. Brighten} and Nick McKeown and Guru Parulkar and Barath Raghavan and Jennifer Rexford and Somaya Arianfar and Dmitriy Kuptsov",

year = "2011",

month = jul,

doi = "10.1145/2002250.2002256",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "41",

pages = "24--36",

journal = "Computer Communication Review",

issn = "0146-4833",

publisher = "Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Architecting for innovation

AU - Koponen, Teemu

AU - Shenker, Scott

AU - Balakrishnan, Hari

AU - Feamster, Nick

AU - Ganichev, Igor

AU - Ghodsi, Ali

AU - Godfrey, P. Brighten

AU - McKeown, Nick

AU - Parulkar, Guru

AU - Raghavan, Barath

AU - Rexford, Jennifer

AU - Arianfar, Somaya

AU - Kuptsov, Dmitriy

PY - 2011/7

Y1 - 2011/7

N2 - We argue that the biggest problem with the current Internet architecture is not a particular functional deficiency, but its inability to accommodate innovation To address this problem we propose a minimal architectural "framework" in which comprehensive architectures can reside The proposed Framework for Internet Innovation (FII) - which is derived from the simple observation that network interfaces should be extensible and abstract - allows for a diversity of architectures to coexist, communicate, and evolve We demonstrate FII's ability to accommodate diversity and evolution with a detailed examination of how information flows through the architecture and with a skeleton implementation of the relevant interfaces.

AB - We argue that the biggest problem with the current Internet architecture is not a particular functional deficiency, but its inability to accommodate innovation To address this problem we propose a minimal architectural "framework" in which comprehensive architectures can reside The proposed Framework for Internet Innovation (FII) - which is derived from the simple observation that network interfaces should be extensible and abstract - allows for a diversity of architectures to coexist, communicate, and evolve We demonstrate FII's ability to accommodate diversity and evolution with a detailed examination of how information flows through the architecture and with a skeleton implementation of the relevant interfaces.

KW - Diversity

KW - Evolution

KW - Innovation

KW - Internet Architecture

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=83455197543&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=83455197543&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1145/2002250.2002256

DO - 10.1145/2002250.2002256

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:83455197543

VL - 41

SP - 24

EP - 36

JO - Computer Communication Review

JF - Computer Communication Review

SN - 0146-4833

IS - 3

ER -

Architecting for innovation

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other links

Fingerprint

Cite this