Arabic Plurals and Root and Pattern Morphology in Palestinian and Egyptian Heritage Speakers

Elabbas Benmamoun, Abdulkafi Albirini, Silvina Andrea Montrul, Eman Saadah

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study investigates heritage speakers' knowledge of plural formation in their colloquial varieties of Arabic, which use both concatenative and non-concatentative modes of derivation. In the concatenative derivation, a plural suffix attaches to the singular stem (muhandis 'engineer-sg.' → muhandis-iin 'engineer-pl'); in the non-concatenative, the relation between the singular (gamal 'camel') and the plural (gimaal 'camels') typically involves vocalic and prosodic alternations with the main shared similarity between the two forms being the consonantal root (e.g., g-m-l). In linguistic approaches, non-concatenative patterns have been captured in different ways, though the earliest and most recognizable approach involves the mapping of a consonantal root onto a plural template. We investigated heritage speakers' knowledge of the root and pattern system in two independent experiments. In Experiment 1, oral narratives were elicited from 20 heritage speakers and 20 native speakers of Egyptian and Palestinian Arabic. In Experiment 2, another group of 24 heritage speakers and 24 native speakers of the same dialects completed an oral picture-description task. The results of the two experiments show that heritage speakers' knowledge of the root and pattern system of Arabic is not target-like. Yet, they have a good grasp of the root and template as basic units of word formation in their heritage Arabic dialects. We discuss implications for debates about the acquisition of the root and pattern system of Arabic morphology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)89-123
Number of pages35
JournalLinguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

experiment
dialect
engineer
colloquial
linguistics
narrative
Heritage Speakers
Egyptians
Palestinians
Experiment
Group
Camel
Native Speaker
Engineers
Template
Consonantal Root
Alternation
Heritage
Word Formation
Oral Narrative

Keywords

  • Arabic
  • Heritage speakers
  • Plural morphology
  • Root and pattern

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Arabic Plurals and Root and Pattern Morphology in Palestinian and Egyptian Heritage Speakers. / Benmamoun, Elabbas; Albirini, Abdulkafi; Montrul, Silvina Andrea; Saadah, Eman.

In: Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, Vol. 4, No. 1, 01.01.2014, p. 89-123.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ae63b2fe84af48128cdb13fa7c48b83c,
title = "Arabic Plurals and Root and Pattern Morphology in Palestinian and Egyptian Heritage Speakers",
abstract = "This study investigates heritage speakers' knowledge of plural formation in their colloquial varieties of Arabic, which use both concatenative and non-concatentative modes of derivation. In the concatenative derivation, a plural suffix attaches to the singular stem (muhandis 'engineer-sg.' → muhandis-iin 'engineer-pl'); in the non-concatenative, the relation between the singular (gamal 'camel') and the plural (gimaal 'camels') typically involves vocalic and prosodic alternations with the main shared similarity between the two forms being the consonantal root (e.g., g-m-l). In linguistic approaches, non-concatenative patterns have been captured in different ways, though the earliest and most recognizable approach involves the mapping of a consonantal root onto a plural template. We investigated heritage speakers' knowledge of the root and pattern system in two independent experiments. In Experiment 1, oral narratives were elicited from 20 heritage speakers and 20 native speakers of Egyptian and Palestinian Arabic. In Experiment 2, another group of 24 heritage speakers and 24 native speakers of the same dialects completed an oral picture-description task. The results of the two experiments show that heritage speakers' knowledge of the root and pattern system of Arabic is not target-like. Yet, they have a good grasp of the root and template as basic units of word formation in their heritage Arabic dialects. We discuss implications for debates about the acquisition of the root and pattern system of Arabic morphology.",
keywords = "Arabic, Heritage speakers, Plural morphology, Root and pattern",
author = "Elabbas Benmamoun and Abdulkafi Albirini and Montrul, {Silvina Andrea} and Eman Saadah",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1075/lab.4.1.04ben",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "89--123",
journal = "Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism",
issn = "1879-9264",
publisher = "John Benjamins Publishing Company",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Arabic Plurals and Root and Pattern Morphology in Palestinian and Egyptian Heritage Speakers

AU - Benmamoun, Elabbas

AU - Albirini, Abdulkafi

AU - Montrul, Silvina Andrea

AU - Saadah, Eman

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - This study investigates heritage speakers' knowledge of plural formation in their colloquial varieties of Arabic, which use both concatenative and non-concatentative modes of derivation. In the concatenative derivation, a plural suffix attaches to the singular stem (muhandis 'engineer-sg.' → muhandis-iin 'engineer-pl'); in the non-concatenative, the relation between the singular (gamal 'camel') and the plural (gimaal 'camels') typically involves vocalic and prosodic alternations with the main shared similarity between the two forms being the consonantal root (e.g., g-m-l). In linguistic approaches, non-concatenative patterns have been captured in different ways, though the earliest and most recognizable approach involves the mapping of a consonantal root onto a plural template. We investigated heritage speakers' knowledge of the root and pattern system in two independent experiments. In Experiment 1, oral narratives were elicited from 20 heritage speakers and 20 native speakers of Egyptian and Palestinian Arabic. In Experiment 2, another group of 24 heritage speakers and 24 native speakers of the same dialects completed an oral picture-description task. The results of the two experiments show that heritage speakers' knowledge of the root and pattern system of Arabic is not target-like. Yet, they have a good grasp of the root and template as basic units of word formation in their heritage Arabic dialects. We discuss implications for debates about the acquisition of the root and pattern system of Arabic morphology.

AB - This study investigates heritage speakers' knowledge of plural formation in their colloquial varieties of Arabic, which use both concatenative and non-concatentative modes of derivation. In the concatenative derivation, a plural suffix attaches to the singular stem (muhandis 'engineer-sg.' → muhandis-iin 'engineer-pl'); in the non-concatenative, the relation between the singular (gamal 'camel') and the plural (gimaal 'camels') typically involves vocalic and prosodic alternations with the main shared similarity between the two forms being the consonantal root (e.g., g-m-l). In linguistic approaches, non-concatenative patterns have been captured in different ways, though the earliest and most recognizable approach involves the mapping of a consonantal root onto a plural template. We investigated heritage speakers' knowledge of the root and pattern system in two independent experiments. In Experiment 1, oral narratives were elicited from 20 heritage speakers and 20 native speakers of Egyptian and Palestinian Arabic. In Experiment 2, another group of 24 heritage speakers and 24 native speakers of the same dialects completed an oral picture-description task. The results of the two experiments show that heritage speakers' knowledge of the root and pattern system of Arabic is not target-like. Yet, they have a good grasp of the root and template as basic units of word formation in their heritage Arabic dialects. We discuss implications for debates about the acquisition of the root and pattern system of Arabic morphology.

KW - Arabic

KW - Heritage speakers

KW - Plural morphology

KW - Root and pattern

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908237313&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84908237313&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1075/lab.4.1.04ben

DO - 10.1075/lab.4.1.04ben

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84908237313

VL - 4

SP - 89

EP - 123

JO - Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism

JF - Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism

SN - 1879-9264

IS - 1

ER -