Arabic pharyngeal and emphatic consonants

Ryan Keith Shosted, Maojing Fu, Zainab Hermes

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Arabic has a relatively large number of speech sounds whose primary or secondary articulation lies in the pharynx. Among these sounds are the pharyngeal class, including and the emphatic or pharyngealized class, including (in Standard Arabic), which stand in phonemic contrast to the plain class. Some examples of the plain/emphatic contrast include the following minimal pairs: /nasaba/ ‘imputed’ vs. /nasaba/ ‘erected’; /tin/ ‘fig’ vs. /tin/ ‘clay’; and /darb/ ‘path’ vs. /darb/ ‘hitting’. An emphatic tap has been posited as a marginal phoneme in at least one dialect (Watson 2002). In addition, a variety of other consonants may be realized as emphatic allophones: [b l m] (Watson 2002). Symbolic transcriptions tend to suggest uniformity in the production of a speech sound, which may be misleading. According to Ladefoged (1993, p. 280), “As soon as [phonetic] data is segmented or described in any way … phonological considerations are bound to be present.” For both the emphatics and pharyngeals, a symbolic transcription seems too phonologically reductive to capture the degree of phonetic variation attested in the literature. Both emphatics and pharyngeals still require significant study, particularly in terms of whole-vocal-tract imaging, to better understand their articulatory and consequent acoustic characteristics across speakers, dialects, and speech styles. Because the sounds are relatively well-studied in Arabic, it will be beneficial to study the sounds as they are realized in other Semitic and Caucasian languages, as well (Maddieson 2009).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Routledge Handbook of Arabic Linguistics
EditorsElabbas Benmamoun, Reem Bassiouney
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages48-61
Number of pages14
ISBN (Electronic)9781351377805
ISBN (Print)9781138783331
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

dialect
phonetics
acoustics
language
Consonant
Emphatics
Sound
literature
Pharyngeals
Transcription
Speech Sounds

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Shosted, R. K., Fu, M., & Hermes, Z. (2017). Arabic pharyngeal and emphatic consonants. In E. Benmamoun, & R. Bassiouney (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Arabic Linguistics (pp. 48-61). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315147062-4

Arabic pharyngeal and emphatic consonants. / Shosted, Ryan Keith; Fu, Maojing; Hermes, Zainab.

The Routledge Handbook of Arabic Linguistics. ed. / Elabbas Benmamoun; Reem Bassiouney. Taylor and Francis, 2017. p. 48-61.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Shosted, RK, Fu, M & Hermes, Z 2017, Arabic pharyngeal and emphatic consonants. in E Benmamoun & R Bassiouney (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Arabic Linguistics. Taylor and Francis, pp. 48-61. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315147062-4
Shosted RK, Fu M, Hermes Z. Arabic pharyngeal and emphatic consonants. In Benmamoun E, Bassiouney R, editors, The Routledge Handbook of Arabic Linguistics. Taylor and Francis. 2017. p. 48-61 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315147062-4
Shosted, Ryan Keith ; Fu, Maojing ; Hermes, Zainab. / Arabic pharyngeal and emphatic consonants. The Routledge Handbook of Arabic Linguistics. editor / Elabbas Benmamoun ; Reem Bassiouney. Taylor and Francis, 2017. pp. 48-61
@inbook{6d06c631b519467389f0fe0d7cd63d16,
title = "Arabic pharyngeal and emphatic consonants",
abstract = "Arabic has a relatively large number of speech sounds whose primary or secondary articulation lies in the pharynx. Among these sounds are the pharyngeal class, including and the emphatic or pharyngealized class, including (in Standard Arabic), which stand in phonemic contrast to the plain class. Some examples of the plain/emphatic contrast include the following minimal pairs: /nasaba/ ‘imputed’ vs. /nasaba/ ‘erected’; /tin/ ‘fig’ vs. /tin/ ‘clay’; and /darb/ ‘path’ vs. /darb/ ‘hitting’. An emphatic tap has been posited as a marginal phoneme in at least one dialect (Watson 2002). In addition, a variety of other consonants may be realized as emphatic allophones: [b l m] (Watson 2002). Symbolic transcriptions tend to suggest uniformity in the production of a speech sound, which may be misleading. According to Ladefoged (1993, p. 280), “As soon as [phonetic] data is segmented or described in any way … phonological considerations are bound to be present.” For both the emphatics and pharyngeals, a symbolic transcription seems too phonologically reductive to capture the degree of phonetic variation attested in the literature. Both emphatics and pharyngeals still require significant study, particularly in terms of whole-vocal-tract imaging, to better understand their articulatory and consequent acoustic characteristics across speakers, dialects, and speech styles. Because the sounds are relatively well-studied in Arabic, it will be beneficial to study the sounds as they are realized in other Semitic and Caucasian languages, as well (Maddieson 2009).",
author = "Shosted, {Ryan Keith} and Maojing Fu and Zainab Hermes",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4324/9781315147062-4",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781138783331",
pages = "48--61",
editor = "Elabbas Benmamoun and Reem Bassiouney",
booktitle = "The Routledge Handbook of Arabic Linguistics",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Arabic pharyngeal and emphatic consonants

AU - Shosted, Ryan Keith

AU - Fu, Maojing

AU - Hermes, Zainab

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Arabic has a relatively large number of speech sounds whose primary or secondary articulation lies in the pharynx. Among these sounds are the pharyngeal class, including and the emphatic or pharyngealized class, including (in Standard Arabic), which stand in phonemic contrast to the plain class. Some examples of the plain/emphatic contrast include the following minimal pairs: /nasaba/ ‘imputed’ vs. /nasaba/ ‘erected’; /tin/ ‘fig’ vs. /tin/ ‘clay’; and /darb/ ‘path’ vs. /darb/ ‘hitting’. An emphatic tap has been posited as a marginal phoneme in at least one dialect (Watson 2002). In addition, a variety of other consonants may be realized as emphatic allophones: [b l m] (Watson 2002). Symbolic transcriptions tend to suggest uniformity in the production of a speech sound, which may be misleading. According to Ladefoged (1993, p. 280), “As soon as [phonetic] data is segmented or described in any way … phonological considerations are bound to be present.” For both the emphatics and pharyngeals, a symbolic transcription seems too phonologically reductive to capture the degree of phonetic variation attested in the literature. Both emphatics and pharyngeals still require significant study, particularly in terms of whole-vocal-tract imaging, to better understand their articulatory and consequent acoustic characteristics across speakers, dialects, and speech styles. Because the sounds are relatively well-studied in Arabic, it will be beneficial to study the sounds as they are realized in other Semitic and Caucasian languages, as well (Maddieson 2009).

AB - Arabic has a relatively large number of speech sounds whose primary or secondary articulation lies in the pharynx. Among these sounds are the pharyngeal class, including and the emphatic or pharyngealized class, including (in Standard Arabic), which stand in phonemic contrast to the plain class. Some examples of the plain/emphatic contrast include the following minimal pairs: /nasaba/ ‘imputed’ vs. /nasaba/ ‘erected’; /tin/ ‘fig’ vs. /tin/ ‘clay’; and /darb/ ‘path’ vs. /darb/ ‘hitting’. An emphatic tap has been posited as a marginal phoneme in at least one dialect (Watson 2002). In addition, a variety of other consonants may be realized as emphatic allophones: [b l m] (Watson 2002). Symbolic transcriptions tend to suggest uniformity in the production of a speech sound, which may be misleading. According to Ladefoged (1993, p. 280), “As soon as [phonetic] data is segmented or described in any way … phonological considerations are bound to be present.” For both the emphatics and pharyngeals, a symbolic transcription seems too phonologically reductive to capture the degree of phonetic variation attested in the literature. Both emphatics and pharyngeals still require significant study, particularly in terms of whole-vocal-tract imaging, to better understand their articulatory and consequent acoustic characteristics across speakers, dialects, and speech styles. Because the sounds are relatively well-studied in Arabic, it will be beneficial to study the sounds as they are realized in other Semitic and Caucasian languages, as well (Maddieson 2009).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045213708&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045213708&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4324/9781315147062-4

DO - 10.4324/9781315147062-4

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85045213708

SN - 9781138783331

SP - 48

EP - 61

BT - The Routledge Handbook of Arabic Linguistics

A2 - Benmamoun, Elabbas

A2 - Bassiouney, Reem

PB - Taylor and Francis

ER -