Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Apples to advocacy: Evaluating consumer preferences for hard cider policies

  • Aaron J. Staples
  • , Philip H. Howard
  • , David S. Conner
  • , J. Robert Sirrine
  • , Marcia R. Ostrom
  • , Michelle Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Hard cider is a sector of a maturing craft beverage industry that continues to experience growth in the United States. Cider is also experiencing challenges, however, such as competition from other alcohol markets, changing consumer preferences, the supply chain, and inflationary pressures. National policy changes may help promote more optimal outcomes for this sector, but public support is important to policy formation. This study uses survey data from a best-worst scaling experiment of consumers in four leading cider-producing states (Michigan, Washington, Wisconsin, and Vermont) to understand preferences toward ten broad cider policy initiatives. The results of multinomial logistic modeling reveal that consumers prefer policies mandating ingredients, nutrition facts, and allergen labeling across all ciders. The least preferred policy initiatives include allowing producers to use vintage on labeling and funding regional cider development. These results have important implications for stakeholders across the industry, including the benefits of labeling disclosures in marketing and the need to improve public awareness of barriers to cider industry development.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)286-301
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Wine Economics
Volume18
Issue number4
Early online dateNov 28 2023
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 28 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • best-worst scaling
  • hard cider
  • policy preferences
  • regulations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Food Science
  • General Business, Management and Accounting
  • Horticulture

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Apples to advocacy: Evaluating consumer preferences for hard cider policies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this