Andean Archaeology I

Variations in Sociopolitical Organization

William H. Isbell (Editor), Helaine Silverman (Editor)

Research output: Book/ReportBook

Abstract

Study of the origin and development of civilization is of unequaled importance for understanding the cultural processes that create human societies. Is cultural evolution directional and regular across human societies and history, or is it opportunistic and capricious? Do apparent regularities come from the way inves­ tigators construct and manage knowledge, or are they the result of real constraints on and variations in the actual processes? Can such questions even be answered? We believe so, but not easily. By comparing evolutionary sequences from different world civilizations scholars can judge degrees of similarity and difference and then attempt explanation. Of course, we must be careful to assess the influence that societies of the ancient world had on one another (the issue of pristine versus non-pristine cultural devel­ opment: see discussion in Fried 1967; Price 1978). The Central Andes were the locus of the only societies to achieve pristine civilization in the southern hemi­ sphere and only in the Central Andes did non-literate (non-written language) civ­ ilization develop. It seems clear that Central Andean civilization was independent on any graph of archaic culture change. Scholars have often expressed appreciation of the research opportunities offered by the Central Andes as a testing ground for the study of cultural evolu­ tion (see, e. g. , Carneiro 1970; Ford and Willey 1949: 5; Kosok 1965: 1-14; Lanning 1967: 2-5).
Original languageEnglish (US)
PublisherSpringer US
Number of pages390
ISBN (Electronic)978-1-4615-0639-3
ISBN (Print)978-1-4613-5171-9
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Archaeology
Civilization
Central Andes
Locus
Culture Change
Regularity
Graph
Cultural Processes
Language
Evolutionary
Regular
History
Testing
Hemisphere
Cultural Evolution

Keywords

  • Andean archaeology
  • evolution
  • Glas
  • obsidian
  • ancient identity politics
  • artefacts
  • development of civilization
  • early Andean civilizations
  • ethnohistory
  • Inca
  • labor-intensive agriculture
  • material artefact
  • sociopolitical organization
  • symbols of power

Cite this

Andean Archaeology I : Variations in Sociopolitical Organization. / Isbell, William H. (Editor); Silverman, Helaine (Editor).

Springer US, 2002. 390 p.

Research output: Book/ReportBook

@book{bb87b742154246f28a602570d1d08aed,
title = "Andean Archaeology I: Variations in Sociopolitical Organization",
abstract = "Study of the origin and development of civilization is of unequaled importance for understanding the cultural processes that create human societies. Is cultural evolution directional and regular across human societies and history, or is it opportunistic and capricious? Do apparent regularities come from the way inves­ tigators construct and manage knowledge, or are they the result of real constraints on and variations in the actual processes? Can such questions even be answered? We believe so, but not easily. By comparing evolutionary sequences from different world civilizations scholars can judge degrees of similarity and difference and then attempt explanation. Of course, we must be careful to assess the influence that societies of the ancient world had on one another (the issue of pristine versus non-pristine cultural devel­ opment: see discussion in Fried 1967; Price 1978). The Central Andes were the locus of the only societies to achieve pristine civilization in the southern hemi­ sphere and only in the Central Andes did non-literate (non-written language) civ­ ilization develop. It seems clear that Central Andean civilization was independent on any graph of archaic culture change. Scholars have often expressed appreciation of the research opportunities offered by the Central Andes as a testing ground for the study of cultural evolu­ tion (see, e. g. , Carneiro 1970; Ford and Willey 1949: 5; Kosok 1965: 1-14; Lanning 1967: 2-5).",
keywords = "Andean archaeology, evolution, Glas, obsidian, ancient identity politics, artefacts, development of civilization, early Andean civilizations, ethnohistory, Inca, labor-intensive agriculture, material artefact, sociopolitical organization, symbols of power",
editor = "Isbell, {William H.} and Helaine Silverman",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1007/978-1-4615-0639-3",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "978-1-4613-5171-9",
publisher = "Springer US",
address = "United States",

}

TY - BOOK

T1 - Andean Archaeology I

T2 - Variations in Sociopolitical Organization

A2 - Isbell, William H.

A2 - Silverman, Helaine

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Study of the origin and development of civilization is of unequaled importance for understanding the cultural processes that create human societies. Is cultural evolution directional and regular across human societies and history, or is it opportunistic and capricious? Do apparent regularities come from the way inves­ tigators construct and manage knowledge, or are they the result of real constraints on and variations in the actual processes? Can such questions even be answered? We believe so, but not easily. By comparing evolutionary sequences from different world civilizations scholars can judge degrees of similarity and difference and then attempt explanation. Of course, we must be careful to assess the influence that societies of the ancient world had on one another (the issue of pristine versus non-pristine cultural devel­ opment: see discussion in Fried 1967; Price 1978). The Central Andes were the locus of the only societies to achieve pristine civilization in the southern hemi­ sphere and only in the Central Andes did non-literate (non-written language) civ­ ilization develop. It seems clear that Central Andean civilization was independent on any graph of archaic culture change. Scholars have often expressed appreciation of the research opportunities offered by the Central Andes as a testing ground for the study of cultural evolu­ tion (see, e. g. , Carneiro 1970; Ford and Willey 1949: 5; Kosok 1965: 1-14; Lanning 1967: 2-5).

AB - Study of the origin and development of civilization is of unequaled importance for understanding the cultural processes that create human societies. Is cultural evolution directional and regular across human societies and history, or is it opportunistic and capricious? Do apparent regularities come from the way inves­ tigators construct and manage knowledge, or are they the result of real constraints on and variations in the actual processes? Can such questions even be answered? We believe so, but not easily. By comparing evolutionary sequences from different world civilizations scholars can judge degrees of similarity and difference and then attempt explanation. Of course, we must be careful to assess the influence that societies of the ancient world had on one another (the issue of pristine versus non-pristine cultural devel­ opment: see discussion in Fried 1967; Price 1978). The Central Andes were the locus of the only societies to achieve pristine civilization in the southern hemi­ sphere and only in the Central Andes did non-literate (non-written language) civ­ ilization develop. It seems clear that Central Andean civilization was independent on any graph of archaic culture change. Scholars have often expressed appreciation of the research opportunities offered by the Central Andes as a testing ground for the study of cultural evolu­ tion (see, e. g. , Carneiro 1970; Ford and Willey 1949: 5; Kosok 1965: 1-14; Lanning 1967: 2-5).

KW - Andean archaeology

KW - evolution

KW - Glas

KW - obsidian

KW - ancient identity politics

KW - artefacts

KW - development of civilization

KW - early Andean civilizations

KW - ethnohistory

KW - Inca

KW - labor-intensive agriculture

KW - material artefact

KW - sociopolitical organization

KW - symbols of power

U2 - 10.1007/978-1-4615-0639-3

DO - 10.1007/978-1-4615-0639-3

M3 - Book

SN - 978-1-4613-5171-9

BT - Andean Archaeology I

PB - Springer US

ER -