Anchoring in the courtroom: The effects of caps on punitive damages

Jennifer K. Robbennolt, Christina A. Studebaker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Responding to the perception that civil damage awards are out of control, courts and legislatures have pursued tort reform efforts largely aimed at reigning in damage awards by juries. One proposed method for reigning in civil juries is to limit, or cap, the amount that can be awarded for punitive damages. Despite significant controversy over damage awards and the civil litigation system, there has been little research focusing on the process by which juries determine damages. In particular, there is a paucity of research on the possible effects of placing caps on punitive damages. The present research examines punitive damage caps and reveals an anchoring effect of the caps on both compensatory and punitive damages. A second experiment replicates this effect and examines the moderating effect of bifurcating the compensatory and punitive damage decisions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)353-373
Number of pages21
JournalLaw and Human Behavior
Volume23
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1999
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology(all)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Law

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Anchoring in the courtroom: The effects of caps on punitive damages'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this