TY - JOUR
T1 - Ancestral Insertions and Expansions of rRNA do not Support an Origin of the Ribosome in Its Peptidyl Transferase Center
AU - Caetano-Anollés, Gustavo
N1 - Funding Information:
I wish to thank Dr. Niles Lehman for supporting this debate, especially in light of the unwillingness of PNAS to discuss subject matter related to one of their publications. I also thank Derek Caetano-Anollés for help in the analysis of insertion fingerprints and for suggestions. Computational biology is supported by grants from NSF (OISE-1172791 and DBI-1041233) and USDA (ILLU-802-909).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
PY - 2015/4/1
Y1 - 2015/4/1
N2 - Phylogenetic reconstruction of ribosomal history suggests that the ribonucleoprotein complex originated in structures supporting RNA decoding and ribosomal mechanics. A recent study of accretion of ancestral expansion segments of rRNA, however, contends that the large subunit of the ribosome originated in its peptidyl transferase center (PTC). Here I re-analyze the rRNA insertion data that supports this claim. Analysis of a crucial three-way junction connecting the long-helical coaxial branch that supports the PTC to the L1 stalk and its translocation functions reveals an incorrect branch-to-trunk insertion assignment that is in conflict with the PTC-centered accretion model. Instead, the insertion supports the ancestral origin of translocation. Similarly, an insertion linking a terminal coaxial trunk that holds the L7–12 stalk and its GTPase center to a seven-way junction of the molecule again questions the early origin of the PTC. Unwarranted assumptions, dismissals of conflicting data, structural insertion ambiguities, and lack of phylogenetic information compromise the construction of an unequivocal insertion-based model of macromolecular accretion. Results prompt integration of phylogenetic and structure-based models to address RNA junction growth and evolutionary constraints acting on ribosomal structure.
AB - Phylogenetic reconstruction of ribosomal history suggests that the ribonucleoprotein complex originated in structures supporting RNA decoding and ribosomal mechanics. A recent study of accretion of ancestral expansion segments of rRNA, however, contends that the large subunit of the ribosome originated in its peptidyl transferase center (PTC). Here I re-analyze the rRNA insertion data that supports this claim. Analysis of a crucial three-way junction connecting the long-helical coaxial branch that supports the PTC to the L1 stalk and its translocation functions reveals an incorrect branch-to-trunk insertion assignment that is in conflict with the PTC-centered accretion model. Instead, the insertion supports the ancestral origin of translocation. Similarly, an insertion linking a terminal coaxial trunk that holds the L7–12 stalk and its GTPase center to a seven-way junction of the molecule again questions the early origin of the PTC. Unwarranted assumptions, dismissals of conflicting data, structural insertion ambiguities, and lack of phylogenetic information compromise the construction of an unequivocal insertion-based model of macromolecular accretion. Results prompt integration of phylogenetic and structure-based models to address RNA junction growth and evolutionary constraints acting on ribosomal structure.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937761987&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937761987&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00239-015-9677-9
DO - 10.1007/s00239-015-9677-9
M3 - Letter
C2 - 25864085
AN - SCOPUS:84937761987
SN - 0022-2844
VL - 80
SP - 162
EP - 165
JO - Journal of Molecular Evolution
JF - Journal of Molecular Evolution
IS - 3-4
ER -