TY - JOUR
T1 - Analyzing El Niño–Southern Oscillation Predictability Using Long-Short-Term-Memory Models
AU - Huang, Andrew
AU - Vega-Westhoff, Ben
AU - Sriver, Ryan L.
N1 - Funding Information:
NOAA High Resolution SST data were provided by the NOAA/OAR/ESRL PSD, Boulder, Colorado, USA, from their Web site at https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/. NCEP Reanalysis data were provided by the NOAA/OAR/ESRL PSD, Boulder, Colorado, USA, from their Web site at https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/. Warm water volume data were provided by TAO Project Office/NOAA/PMEL/Seattle, from their Web site at http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/tao/. In Python, visuals were made with HoloViews and matplotlib, LSTM models were built with Keras, LR models were built with scikit-learn, and data management and wrangling were done with xarray, pandas, and numpy. We thank Cécile Penland for her insightful feedback and comments that greatly improved an earlier version of this paper.
Publisher Copyright:
©2019. The Authors.
PY - 2019/2/1
Y1 - 2019/2/1
N2 - El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) can have global impacts, affecting daily temperature and precipitation, and extreme weather, such as hurricanes and tornadoes. Because of its importance, scientists strive to understand the processes that govern ENSO and develop models to predict its evolution and changes in variability. Here long-short-term-memory models (LSTMs) were compared to linear regression models (LR) to explore the benefits of simple, deep neural networks in predicting ENSO, in addition to quantifying the relative importance of the sources of ENSO's predictability. The models use central Pacific sea surface temperatures (SST), equatorial Pacific warm water volumes, and western Pacific zonal winds as predictors, individually and in combinations, on monthly and daily resolutions, from 1- to 11-month leads. By using these predictors, many characteristic time scales are encompassed—from days-to-weeks in the atmosphere, to months-to-seasons in the coupled system, and interseasonal-to-interannual in the subsurface ocean. Results show, with monthly input, predictions from LSTM were like predictions from LR. However, with daily SST at longer leads, LSTM exhibited some advantage over LR in terms of the correlation coefficient. This suggests that daily SST may contain some nonlinear element that improves LSTM predictability compared to LR. In addition, this suggests that more information, such as gridded data and additional variables, would likely improve predictability using LSTM, but results would be more difficult to interpret. Overall, LSTM may be appealing because once the computationally expensive training of LSTM is complete, the predictions employing the trained model can be relatively cheap to perform thereafter.
AB - El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) can have global impacts, affecting daily temperature and precipitation, and extreme weather, such as hurricanes and tornadoes. Because of its importance, scientists strive to understand the processes that govern ENSO and develop models to predict its evolution and changes in variability. Here long-short-term-memory models (LSTMs) were compared to linear regression models (LR) to explore the benefits of simple, deep neural networks in predicting ENSO, in addition to quantifying the relative importance of the sources of ENSO's predictability. The models use central Pacific sea surface temperatures (SST), equatorial Pacific warm water volumes, and western Pacific zonal winds as predictors, individually and in combinations, on monthly and daily resolutions, from 1- to 11-month leads. By using these predictors, many characteristic time scales are encompassed—from days-to-weeks in the atmosphere, to months-to-seasons in the coupled system, and interseasonal-to-interannual in the subsurface ocean. Results show, with monthly input, predictions from LSTM were like predictions from LR. However, with daily SST at longer leads, LSTM exhibited some advantage over LR in terms of the correlation coefficient. This suggests that daily SST may contain some nonlinear element that improves LSTM predictability compared to LR. In addition, this suggests that more information, such as gridded data and additional variables, would likely improve predictability using LSTM, but results would be more difficult to interpret. Overall, LSTM may be appealing because once the computationally expensive training of LSTM is complete, the predictions employing the trained model can be relatively cheap to perform thereafter.
KW - fuzzy logic
KW - model verification and validation
KW - modeling
KW - neural networks
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061842551&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061842551&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1029/2018EA000423
DO - 10.1029/2018EA000423
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85061842551
SN - 2333-5084
VL - 6
SP - 212
EP - 221
JO - Earth and Space Science
JF - Earth and Space Science
IS - 2
ER -